-Caveat Lector-

>From http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61647-2002Dec1.html

washingtonpost.com

Antiwar Effort Gains Momentum
Growing Peace Movement's Ranks Include Some Unlikely Allies

By Evelyn Nieves
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 2, 2002; Page A01

AMHERST, Mass. -- The idea was hatched on a bright day in August, when Daphne Reed
was celebrating her daughter's and granddaughter's birthdays, and the talk around the
living room sofa turned to war.Reed began worrying that her 25-year-old grandson, who
spent four years in the Coast Guard, might be called to serve if the United States 
were to
invade Iraq. Her family also wondered why the United States was threatening to invade 
Iraq
even before United Nations weapons inspections began. And Reed fretted over the
particular suffering that would befall Iraqi women; their sons and husbands would be 
killed,
she said, and the women would be left in the rubble to fend off contaminated water and
starvation.

"I said that all mothers should automatically be against war," Reed said. "It was 
against
their nature to be violent instead of nurturing." Maybe, she said, it was time to 
start a
movement -- Mothers Against War.

Reed's response is just a tiny part of a growing peace movement that has been gaining
momentum and raises the possibility that there could be much more dissent if U.S. bombs
begin falling on Baghdad.

The retired Hampshire College drama teacher e-mailed about 15 parents in her address
book. Reed reached people such as Elaine Kenseth, whose five children include a son she
adopted from the killing fields of Cambodia. Aileen O'Donnell, a veteran of the women's
movement. Joanne and Roger Lind, whose son was a Vietnam War conscientious objector.
And Elizabeth Verrill, who had never been involved in political causes. Before long, 
Mothers
Against War had 50 core members, and thousands of supporters around the country and
the world.

Most members of Mothers Against War are grandmothers in their seventies whose lives are
already full. Yet they spend hours a day on the Internet, reading and spreading 
information
on Iraq and the United States and planning for marches, e-mail campaigns and teach-ins.
Having lived through the Vietnam antiwar movement, which took years to build, the 
Mothers
Against War are buoyed to find themselves part of a fast-growing movement of people
from every walk of life, from every political stripe.

The extraordinary array of groups questioning the Bush administration's rationale for 
an
invasion of Iraq includes longtime radical groups such as the Workers World Party, but 
also
groups not known for taking stands against the government. There is a labor movement
against war, led by organizers of the largest unions in the country; a religious 
movement
against the war, which includes leaders of virtually every mainstream denomination; a
veterans movement against the war, led by those who fought Iraq in the Persian Gulf a
decade ago; business leaders against the war, led by corporate leaders; an antiwar
movement led by relatives of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks; and immigrant 
groups
against the war.

There are also black and Latino organizations, hundreds of campus antiwar groups and
scores of groups of ordinary citizens meeting in community centers and church basements
from Baltimore to Seattle.

It has reached a point where United for Peace, a Web site started by the San Francisco-
based human rights organization Global Exchange for groups to list events commemorating
the Sept. 11 anniversary, has morphed into a national network coordinating events for
more than 70 peace groups nationwide.

"We're taking the . . . Web site and rebuilding it as a one-stop shopping for the 
antiwar
movement," said Andrea Buffa, who co-chairs the new network. "It's a campaign of all
different kinds of groups, from the National Council of Churches to the International
Socialists organization; I just got a call from the Raging Grannies of Palo Alto, who 
want to
join. We're bringing groups together to develop a consensus statement and a calendar of
coordinated antiwar events."

Next Test: Dec. 10 Rallies

After large rallies in Washington and San Francisco on Oct. 26, the next big day to 
test the
antiwar movement's might is Dec. 10, International Human Rights Day. Hundreds of groups
plan events, rallies and civil disobedience to capture the nation's attention, 
including
demonstrations in Lafayette Park across from the White House and at a military 
recruitment
center in downtown Washington.

Otherwise, antiwar groups, which tend to rely on the Internet to receive and spread
information, operate largely without the attention of the media or Capitol Hill. Yet 
many of
those speaking out against an attack on Iraq represent large numbers of Americans,
including John J. Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO (with 13 million members); the
National Council of Churches (which represents 36 Protestant and Orthodox 
denominations,
with 50 million members); and the National Conference of Catholic Bishops (the 
leadership
arm of 65 million Roman Catholics).

Among themselves, the groups are quietly organizing their ranks. A letter Sweeney sent 
to
Congress in early October expressing deep reservations about the justifications for an
invasion has begun to resonate among the rank and file, said Bob Muehlenkamp, a labor
consultant and former organizing director for the Teamsters union. Several hundred
thousand union members, he said, have signed up against the war, with more joining 
every
week. He expects the numbers to balloon when leaders hold an organizational breakfast
meeting for all unions in New York on Dec. 18.

"Union people are the most patriotic of Americans," Muehlenkamp said, "yet you can't 
find
all- out aggressive support for a Bush war." Union members have the same concerns as
others opposed to the proposed war, including a belief that the Bush administration 
has not
weighed the economic consequences or made the case for an unprecedented attack, he
said. But they have their own concerns as well. "For unions," he said, "it's their 
kids that are
going to be doing the fighting. It's our sons and daughters who could die."

The National Council of Churches, which includes Lutherans, Episcopalians and President
Bush's denomination, Methodists, is facilitating antiwar events for traditionally 
liberal
institutions and conservative churches, said the Rev. Robert Edgar, its general 
secretary.

"Average, ordinary people," Edgar said, "who come from evangelical Christian 
conservative
roots are organizing against the war." Edgar, who served in Congress as a Democrat from
suburban Philadelphia from 1975 to 1987, recalled that he was a freshman Democrat
during the last days of the Vietnam War. Even then, he said, he and other lawmakers had
to fight to end U.S. involvement. He also remembered that it took the church -- meaning
most mainstream religious institutions -- 12 years to start opposing that war. 
"Whereas, the
threat of war now has even middle churches, not just liberal churches, involved in 
antiwar
activities," he said.

During its annual meeting last month, the National Council of Churches issued a 
statement
praising the National Conference of Catholic Bishops for reiterating its position 
against a
U.S. invasion. "We thought it was important to acknowledge their important work," Edgar
said.

Now, he said, the National Council of Churches -- fresh from its "What Would Jesus 
Drive?"
television ad campaign to promote fuel efficiency -- is launching a "Seasons of
Peacemaking" campaign, "moving beyond statements to actions. On December 8 through
15, there will be a series of actions across the country." The biggest day, he said, 
is Dec.
10, which is significant not only because it is Human Rights Day but also because it 
is the
day that former president Jimmy Carter is to receive his Nobel Peace Prize. "Carter, 
as an
evangelical Christian, represents a great number of people in the antiwar effort," 
Edgar
said.

Indeed, on that day, religious groups across the country plan to stage mass acts of 
civil
disobedience. Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry's ice cream, founder of Business Leaders for
Sensible Priorities, plans to join church groups in New York and get arrested, he 
said, for
the first time.

"I've never engaged in civil disobedience before," he said. "But if some country was 
going to
do this to us -- have a little preemptive war with the U.S., bomb our people, kill or 
maim
people because they thought that at some time we might bomb them, we'd say that's a war
crime. I feel that getting arrested is the biggest statement that I could make to say 
that
what the Bush administration is doing is wrong."

That day, as well as the weekend of the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, Jan. 18-19, is
important for the smaller groups across the country as well. Damu Smith, founder of the
Washington- based Black Voices for Peace, said his group plans to begin a poor people's
peace movement similar to the one King was organizing before his murder in 1968. Black
Voices is planning its own rallies and forums in Washington, as well as participating 
in
planning national events as a member of the steering committee for United for Peace, he
said.

"Before Doctor King died," Smith said, "he was speaking out forcefully against the 
United
States involvement in Vietnam. He made the point that the money being spent on bombs
was money that could never be spent on addressing poverty. We are taking up Doctor
King's legacy."

While African Americans and other minorities have been underrepresented in some 
national
campaigns, such as the environmental movement, Smith, executive director of the 
National
Black Environmental Justice Network, said that he has had no trouble recruiting 
against the
proposed war. The group, which he began a few weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, in response
to a lack of African American voices in the policy debates and newscasts surrounding 
the
attacks, has more than 3,000 members, he said.

Not all are African American. "We get calls from people who say, 'I'm white, but I 
want to
join your group,' just as in the civil rights movement. It's such a shame that the 
media has
not focused on what is happening because there are so many voices working together."

Remembering Another War

Those who still remember the horrors of the Vietnam War, like the members of Mothers
Against War, find themselves connected to this new antiwar movement on a personal as
well as ideological level. The other day, as half a dozen core members sat in Daphne
Reed's living room, they remembered friends who had fled to Canada to shield their sons
from the military draft, friends who died in the war, and lives forever changed by the 
war.

Joanne and Roger Lind, 77 and 78, respectively, are retired professors of sociology and
social work, whose son received his draft card as soon as he turned 18 in 1965. As
Quakers, the Linds were actively working toward peaceful solutions to the crisis, 
including
organizing teach-ins. Their son became a conscientious objector, and did community 
work,
known then as alternative service. "But sons of our friends were not so lucky," Joanne 
Lind
said. "They served two years in prison."

Elaine Kenseth, at 59 the youngest of the group, remembered that her friends started
getting married in 1964 before finishing school so that their men could be exempt from 
the
draft. "Others left for Canada. They lived there until President Carter created the 
amnesty
for them."

She became active in helping refugees of the war resettle in Western Massachusetts, and
adopted her Cambodian son, when he was 16. "When we say we're mothers against war,"
she said, "we're also saying we're mothers seeking peace. We are activists for 
spreading
peace in the world."

Reed, recalling the four wars she has seen this country involved in during her 
lifetime, said
she is often motivated by a single memory decades old. She was visiting the nation's
capital, she said, when she saw a man without a face.

"Yes," she said, "without a face. He had nothing but a plastic mask with two holes for 
eyes
and one for mouth. It still swims before my inner vision, provoking an agony of grief 
that no
one had been able to stop the war that took away that man's face."

© 2002 The Washington Post Company
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's 
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without 
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of 
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to