On 27/04/2012 17:46, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 04:58:14PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Hmm, I indended lnat to be shorthand for "unsigned long". I'd much
rather we used size_t when we mean that, and keep lnat as meaning
"unsigned long".
I'm certainly happy with using size_t instead of lnat.
When should lnat be used, though? When would you want a 32-bit value on
Windows/x86_64, but a 64-bit value on Linux/x86_64?
That's a good point. I'd be ok with lnat being 64 bits on Windows/x64.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
