That sounds like a good plan to me. Manuel
Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com>: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:41:11PM +1100, Ben Lippmeier wrote: >> >>> For vector and random the same questions apply, but since we simply have >>> lagging git repos for them we can create a ghc-7.6 branch. Did you >>> deliberately not do that, Ian? >> >> I expect Ian didn't branch DPH because it's not his job to test it with the >> GHC RC and ship it as part of the GHC source tarball. I can do the release >> part, but if Ian branches DPH as well then it is effectively zero-overhead >> to his existing workflow, and we won't hit this breakage again (I think?). > > Right, I didn't branch them as we don't use them in the stable branch. > But I can make the branches for future stable branches if that's useful, > no problem. > > > Thanks > Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list Cvs-ghc@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
