On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, James R. Phillips wrote: > Does fixing this bug require upstream intervention, or can you just develop a > patch, and submit it to upstream?
If it is only the std::string implementation that uses the described optimization the problem can be worked around by just rebuilding libstdc++ with _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING defined. If other classes provided by libstdc++ use similiar techniques the best solution would be to get libstdc++ built as shared library which according to Charles Wilson is unfortunately a "hard problem" :( I'll try to rebuild libstdc++ now with _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING defined and will report back if there is interest. I would like to help to get this issue resolved. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
