--- Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030211_157.html
I was under the impression that a standard technique in use today was to gauge a `suspect's' reaction to key words, phrases, faces, or even situations; anything from whether someone responded to a trigger via an involuntary eye movement, to changes in normal daily patterned behavior might lead an `investigator' to conclude that a series of correlated associations tended to imply involvement in a crime or other situation of interest. Merely measuring spikes on a lobotomised encephelograph hardly strikes me as being representative of the state of the art, but then what the fuck do I know? Regards, Steve ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
