On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tim May wrote: > > Regarding TEMPEST shielding - there is another, complementary approach > > for > > shielding: jamming. There are vendors selling devices that drown the RF > > emissions of computer equipment in noise, so TEMPEST receivers get > > nothing. Are there any publicly available specs of such generators, or > > even building plans? > > Jamming is grossly less efficient than detection. If you want an > explanation, let me know and I'll spend 10 minutes writing a small > piece on it. But first, think deeply about why this is so. Think > especially about recovering signals from noise.
It sounds like there is an opertunity here for the right person. Open up a place to "clean your clothes" of all those little RFID tags and other buglets people are so interested in attaching to any object (nailed down or not).
