On Tuesday 16 December 2003 21:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/15/2003 9:44:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > There are specific clauses which refer to not publically humiliating a > > prisoner. I'm surprised the Agitprop Division didn't show video of > > Saddam taking his first dump while in custody. > > > > Saddam is not a good guy. But this went beyond the pale. > > You're one-hundred percent correct. I saw that sack of shit Rumsfeld on a > press conference this afternoon where he answered the specific question of > does > parading Saddam around violate the Geneva convention. His answer was that > some > things are more important, that it was necessary to show to the world that > Saddam was in custody and he wasn't going to be back in power, etc. He > added that Saddam is being treated humanly, and he takes offense to anyone > who suggests > otherwise.
In other words, "yes". Following in the footsteps of Richard Perle. âI think in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing.â (http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1089158,00.html) 'Scuse me whilst I go vomit.