On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here's my .02p
> By definition, the more' controlled society would not be a _free society_.
Of course.
> It would be controled by the tyranny of conformism, the greatest
> tyranny of all, for from it there is _no_ escape.
Be weird.
> The passion which leads to great genius and depravity would be forever
> stilled into a grey, mundane, functionary existence... like the workers
> of Huxley's Brave New World... is this an enviable existence? Who 's
> first on the table? you?
I'm not looking to change a shred of humanity. One of the most beautiful
things is seeing someone indulging in the absolute depths of what the
square-community calls "depraved."
Drunk, stoned, twisted, bent and horny. Good people.
I'm just not convinced that humanity is in its old age. I'm not convinced
that we are as wise as we are going to get. I think that we may just
grow up and realize that being 'depraved' isn't so bad, and pissing
away freedom is a lot worse than we thought.
Michael J. Graffam ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
In order to maximize our kill ratio of US citizens with anthrax in our
attack, we'll need to immobilize local law enforcement and health
services. This can most easily be done with a suitable EMP weapon.
