Phill Hallam-Baker writes: >The problem with the KKK, AN and other groups of thugs isn't what they say, >it is what they do - beat people up. > >As for being PC, can anyone explain how an organization could >be less tollerant of opposing views than the AN? Perhaps not less tolerant, but certainly more dangerous: by having government as its enforcer. This is why folks are disturbed by the lawsuits against NAMBLA and the like. Not that most of us have any use for them or their philosophy, but that the folks suing them are in effect using the power of government to "beat them up". - GH _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
- Re: And you thought Nazi ag... Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: And you thought Nazi ag... Lizard
- Re: And you thought Nazi ag... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: And you thought Nazi ag... Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop wa... Tim May
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitpr... Omri Schwarz ---
- Re: And you thought Nazi ag... Tim May
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Omri Schwarz ---
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Omri Schwarz ---
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Gil Hamilton
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Secret Squirrel
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controversial? Kevin Elliott
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controvers... Jodi Hoffman
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controvers... Jodi Hoffman
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controvers... Jodi Hoffman
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was contro... Kevin Elliott
- Re: And you thought Nazi agitprop was controvers... Jodi Hoffman