On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:08:01AM -0800, Tim May wrote: > A "vote at home" protocol is vulnerable to all sorts of mischief that > has nothing to do with hackers intercepting the vote, blah blah. Righto. Absentee ballots require a witness, usually an officer (if you're in the military) or a notary-type, to reduct in par tthe intimidation problem. -Declan
- A secure voting protocol Ray Dillinger
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol Jim Burnes
- Re: A secure voting protocol Bill Stewart
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol James A. Donald
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol Declan McCullagh
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- Re: A secure voting protocol Tim May
- The Ant and the Grasshopper, El... Tim May
- Re: The Ant and the Grassho... Mac Norton
- Re: The Ant and the Grassho... Ken Brown
- Re: A secure voting protocol Declan McCullagh
- Re: A secure voting protocol Declan McCullagh
- Re: A secure voting protocol Bill Stewart