On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Craig Citro, 18.11.2010 09:13:
>>   * Does github have any sort of mailing list support? I'd love to see
>> cython-dev migrated
>
> -1
>
>
>> to something with better searchability, linking, archives, etc
>
> What's wrong with all the archives of the current mailing list? Doesn't at
> least one of them suite your way of using a ML archive? Gmane alone has
> three different web interfaces.
>
> And in what way is "linking" different from "posting a link" or "referring
> to an archive post"? I never had any problem with either of those.

There's no canonical link for a message or a thread, most of the
archives chop threads at month boundaries, and I, for one, don't like
the treaded views they offer near as much.

>> -- I don't know that there's any special link between
>> google groups and code.google.com, so this is really orthogonal to the
>> project hosting question. I know the decision to use codespeak was
>> made as an explicit decision against google groups, but my
>> understanding is that whatever objections there were are now gone. Is
>> that still the case?
>
>  From comparing the ML related comments on cython-dev and cython-users, I
> got the impression that it wasn't that a good idea to have a mailing list
> on google-groups. I remember reading things like "I thought top-posting was
> the right thing to do on google-groups" more than once. An environment that
> doesn't help people to do the right thing doesn't feel welcoming to me. And
> I really hate the way google-groups presents archived threads. Makes them
> totally hard to read.

I find google groups easier to administer and use, but I consider most
of these to be matters of taste and opinion (I prefer bottom posting
as well, though not to the same extreme). So for now we have a
compromise between our -users and -dev lists, and though we'd both
like to move them to the same place (in opposite directions) it seems
to be working fine. In particular, I don't think the mailing lists
need to be tied to the other infrastructure (whereas having issue
trackers and code review in the same place is really handy...)

- Robert
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to