(Please include header and footer when redistributing this material.)
_________________________________________________________________

                 THE DAFYOMI DISCUSSION LIST

      brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
             Rosh Kollel Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 [REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE TO DISCUSS THE DAF WITH THE KOLLEL]
________________________________________________________________

Makos 005a: Edim with good eyesight

dalezma asked:

Rava says that we do not suspect the witnesses of having an exceptionally good 
eyesight.  The implications is that it is something possible, yet we do not 
take it into account.  My questions is: why not?  Doesn't "VeHitzilu" require 
that every possibility be taken into account?  at least to acquit the
witnesses.
The Ritva (s.v.Mahu) raises a related question (a contradiction in Rava)  and 
confirms that indeed we never suspect a good eyesight and do not accept such a 
claim.  Tos in Yevamos 116a (s.v. Hocho) says that if the witnesses raise this 
as a defense they are believed (to the point of executing the defendant?).
But 
this reinforces my question, (as pointed out by the Ritva, see also Tos in 
Makos 7a s.v. Dilma) if such an argument is acceptable when raised by the 
witnesses then the judges should raise it themselves because of "VeHitzilu"?  
Furthermore, if such as argument is not acceptable (as claimed by Ritva and 
other Rishonim quoted by him) could the judges themselves test the witnesses' 
eyesigh?  What about an (or 2) expert witness(es), could they testify about
the 
witnesses eyesight?

--------------------------------

The Kollel replies 

Tosfos Shantz actually says that in this case we consider the Edim as
Zomemim only with regard to the defendant. However, as far as the Edim
themselves are concerned, we will not prosecute them since it is possible
that they have unusual eyesight.

However, other Rishonim write that we invoke the principle of "Holchim
b'Nefashos Achar ha'Rov" as long as the Edim themselves did not actually
claim that they saw the event from the distance.

D. Zupnik 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in the body of the message:
unsubscribe daf-discuss

Reply via email to