(Please include header and footer when redistributing this material.)
_________________________________________________________________
THE DAFYOMI DISCUSSION LIST
brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Yerushalayim
Rosh Kollel: Rabbi Mordecai Kornfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE TO DISCUSS THE DAF WITH THE KOLLEL]
________________________________________________________________
Menachos 034: Mezuzah, Rabeinu Tam Tefilin
Shabtai Nacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
(a)Why the casing of the Mezusah is not considered chasisah between the
parchement and the door-post?
(b)Why Rabenu Tam ask the Soferim at his time on the order of the
parchement? Was everyone had Rashi Tefilin before Rabenu Tam instituting
the change??
Shabtai Nacson, Toronto,Canada
----------------------------------------------
The Kollel replies:
(a) The Pischei Teshuvah (Yoreh De'ah 289:2) records the Minhag of the
Vilna Ga'on not to wrap the Mezuzah, due to the concern for Chatzitzah.
However, the Maharam Shik (Yoreh De'ah 288) offers explanations for our
Minhag to place the Mezuzah in a casing. One of his explanations is the
rationale that whatever is used for protection is not considered a
Chatzitzah, and is Batel to the Mezuzah.
(b) The two Minhagim regarding the order of the Tefilin predates Rashi and
Rabeinu Tam by hundreds of years (see Tosfos), and is alluded to in the
Zohar. (Apparently both were used in different communities, at the time of
Rabeinu Tam and Rashi -MK)
D. Zupnik
--------
It is true that it has been said in the name of the Vilna Ga'on not to wrap
the Mezuzah -- and that some Briskers nowadays simply nail it in place
under a piece of parchment, to satisfy this opinion. However, the ARUCH
HA'SHULCHAN (Siman 289) and CHAZON ISH both write that whoever cited the
Ga'on on this matter, must have misunderstood what the Ga'on said. He
cannot have written that it is a Chatzitzah which disqualifies the Mezuzah,
since the Gemara (Bava Metzia top of 102a) says that it may be placed
inside a bamboo tube. The Chayei Adam (a close disciple and relative of the
Ga'on) also seems to be of the opinion that a Mezuzah may be wrapped, since
he discusses (in Hilchos Tzeniyus) double wrapping the Mezuzah.
One might argue that the Vilna Ga'on only opposed a wrapper that is not
secured to the wall of the house, such as a plastic bag (or piece of
leather). The bamboo tube was nailed to the wall, so it was not considered
a Chatzitzah, but rather part of the wall itself. Others point out,
however, that if this argument is true, it would be necessary to *first*
secure the tube to the wall, and only then to insert the Mezuzah, in order
to avoid the problem of Ta'aseh v'Lo Min he'Asuy.
M. Kornfeld, based on a discussion with Rav Eliyahu Feldman
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in the body of the message:
unsubscribe daf-discuss
