Herbert Xu wrote: >Sorry, but this is not the only place where dash relies on alloca. >So you're bound to run into this problem again if you have a script >that attempts to push dash to use more than 8MB in places like this.
Sure, but the same problem existing in other places isn't a reason not to fix it here. >So I'm not going to accept this patch as alloca makes things a lot >simpler in some cases. Granted, I recall the simplification of the code that resulted from the replacement of malloc by alloca in this case. This patch retains that simplicity. Ron
