On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 17:49:13, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > On 1/10/2013 1:07 PM, Kumar, Anil wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 18:17:46, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > > I do not think that it is good idea to move NAND pin mux information > > into da850.dtsi because this information is evm specific. > > if we will use this approach then we must use the same approach for > > other modules also as ASoC etc. > > Why do you consider this EVM specific. IOW, which pins do you see > changing on another board? BTW, if there are additional pins needed than > what are listed, we can always add more pinux entries in the .dts files. > The pins present in dtsi file should the base case. Ok, we can use this approach for DaVinci as its SoC modules do not have multiple pin configuration option. I will do the changes in next patch series.
Thanks, Anil _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source