Did you consider DBIx::NestedHash? Would that make any sense? On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:29, Byrd, Brendan <byr...@insightcom.com> wrote:
> I currently have a working and tested model for a “nested hash to table” > conversion. [...] > > ** ** > > My dilemma is: Where exactly should this kind of module go in the CPAN > namespace? There’s a number of potential choices that I see:**** > > ** ** > > *AnyData::Format::NestedHash – *[...] > > *DBD::AnyData::Format::NestedHash – *[...] > > *DBD::NestedHash – *[...] > I'm not sure it fits there; it may be more driver-related than built atop DBI. But you didn't mention the DBIx namespace... -- Jonathan Leffler <jonathan.leff...@gmail.com> #include <disclaimer.h> Guardian of DBD::Informix - v2011.0612 - http://dbi.perl.org "Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall never cease to be amused."
