On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:49:09AM +0000, Martin J. Evans wrote: > On 26/02/12 12:27, Tim Bunce wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:18:56PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > > > >> I'm slightly puzzled by a couple of the tests skipping because 'Not > >> running with SQL::Statement', when > >> in fact I have SQL::Statement installed. > >> > >> t/52dbm_complex.t ............... ok > >> t/zvg_52dbm_complex.t ........... ok > >> t/zvn_52dbm_complex.t ........... skipped: Not running with > >> SQL::Statement > >> t/zvp_52dbm_complex.t ........... ok > >> t/zvxgn_52dbm_complex.t ......... skipped: Not running with > >> SQL::Statement > >> t/zvxgnp_52dbm_complex.t ........ skipped: Not running with > >> SQL::Statement > >> t/zvxgp_52dbm_complex.t ......... ok > >> t/zvxnp_52dbm_complex.t ......... skipped: Not running with > >> SQL::Statement > >> > >> Maybe it is the message that needs tweakiing? > > > >Yes, they should be changed to "requires SQL::Statement module". > > I thought the "Not running with SQL::Statement" meant the test code > uses SQL::Statement but the test code was not running with > SQL::Statement e.g., t/zvn_52dbm_complex.t uses Nano and zvp* is Pure > Perl so they don't use SQL::Statement. For those tests it is > irrelevant if you have SQL::Statement or not - no?
Ah, right. The "n" variants set the DBI_SQL_NANO env var in order to test the bundled DBI::SQL::Nano SQL engine. So a better phrasing would be something like: skipped: DBI::SQL::Nano is being used I'll change it. Thanks Martin. Tim.