Hi Jens,
You interrupted me at every 5 words I tried to explain about what was
discussed at the consensus meetings at the QA Hackathon in
Berlin. We had a big argument, and you never ever did let me finish
the explanation. You told me how bad the decision was, but you never
let me explain the whole stuff. And now you are writing about this
and not even waiting for the official stuff to be published. Please
wait until the whole decision comes online, David Golden will write a
proposal. Really, it will be balanced, and it will make sense. Just
calm down and wait.
Greetz,
Wendy
At 01:23 PM 4/22/2015, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>
>> Am 22.04.2015 um 12:21 schrieb H.Merijn Brand <h.m.br...@xs4all.nl>:
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:01:46 +0200, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Merijn,
>>>
>>> since Wendy told me yesterday that every new module must (should)
>>> have a co-maint,
>>
>> It was decided upon to be *advisory* for upstream modules: those that
>> have modules on CPAN that depend on it or where is known that DarkPAN
>> users have publicly shown that they are using the module.
>>
>> The latter is not (yet) visible on any of the current CPAN clients.
>>
>> co-maint is not obligatory. certainly not for new modules.
>
>Than I misunderstood probably something. Anyway - it might be a good
>idea, either - for keeping an eye on it or whatsoever :)
>
>> FWIW, I am in serious doubt if I want to have anyone co-maint
>> Text::CSV_XS at all.
>
>Come on - I had commit bit for years on repo.or.cz and didn't misuse it
>in any way.
>
>>> could I count on you for upcoming AnyData2 / DBD::AnyData2?
>>
>> /me is in serious doubt, as the main purpose of these modules is way
>> out of my focus area: I never use them.
>
>My primary reason to use DBD::CSV from time to time is to keep on track
>how the users problems look like ;)
>For the typical problems I solve using it, it's overkill ...
>
>You're familiar with the separation of storage / parsing engine, you're
>familiar with DBI::DBD::SqlEngine and you're more or less familiar with
>SQL::Statement ...
>
>> Do you know of any CPAN author that is using them or has shown interest
>> in these? That would IMHO be a better choice.
>
>Seriously: Nope. Only DarkPAN :(
>
>>> I don't want to start on dbi-dev@ a general discussion - so
>>> AD2: yes or no?
>
>Cheers
>--
>Jens Rehsack
>rehs...@gmail.com
