Hi Karsten,

the code used to build DBpedia 3.9 (which has version 3.9 as well) has not
been merged to the master branch yet.
I think you can use the "dump" branch for a quick test (it uses Scala
2.10.2) but please note that it is not aligned with master.

Hope this helps.

Cheers
Andrea


2013/11/19 Karsten Jeschkies <jes...@web.de>

> Hi,
>
> I would like to use the core of the extraction framework with sbt. I
> cloned the git repository, compiled the lib with maven and then copied then
> core-3.8.jar to my sbt project folder. It works for a simple test tool.
>
> However, I want to use Slick and need Scala 2.10.2 for that. In a release
> not it says that core 3.9. uses scala 2.10.2 but mvn compile results in a
> 3.8 that uses scala 2.9.2. What am I doing wrong?
>
> thx for your help,
> Karsten
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up
> now.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to