Leo, For technical details of the Linux DCCP implementation, you are probably better off asking on their mailing list at d...@vger.kernel.org (http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#dccp)
That said, I've worked on the DCCP Linux implementation extensively, and I don't believe there are any shared buffers between DCCP and TCP. They are implemented as completely separate protocols. As far as fairness between TCP and DCCP goes, if you're talking about OS level fairness that should happen automatically as packets for each are processed in turn as they arrive. You may observe some performance differences since DCCP requires a system call to send/receive every packet while TCP can accept large buffers from userspace and break them into many packets. I've seen this to cause issues on virtual machines running without virtualization extensions. Protocol level fairness is more interesting. I would note that Linux prior to 3.2 included a very broken implementation of CCID2 (see [1] for details) so I'd make sure you are using a recent kernel. Beyond that, it will heavily depend on which CCID you are using... [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/dccp/msg04459.html -- Samuel Jero Doctoral Student Computer Science Dependable and Secure Distributed Systems Lab Purdue University sj...@purdue.edu On 11/30/2013 12:41 PM, Leo Osvald wrote: > Hi folks, > > Might be a dumb question, but I would appreciate if someone could answer: > 1) If I use DCCP protocol on Linux for one connection and TCP for > another and both connections send data concurrently, would they compete > for any (shared) buffer space in the OS, or they are completely > independent of each other? > 2) If the buffers are independent, is there a good way to ensure > fairness, such that it doesn't happen that DCCP connection never gets > its turn because TCP connection is sending all the time? > > Thanks, > Leo >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
