well, i stand corrected:

> > Try 9/26/69.  I'd say that's the earliest, even though he says
> > its 10/25/69.

> I'm pretty sure that's the first one. I was going to say 8/30/69,
> but that has the tighten-up jam.

now i gotta dig out the tape of 09-26-69.  hmm...  is that out on cdr
yet???

I-)  ihor


Reply via email to