[Deathpenalty] death penalty news----USA

[Rick Halperin]

February 11, 2008


USA:

U.S. Said to Seek Execution for 6 in Sept. 11 Case

Military prosecutors have decided to seek the death penalty for six
Guantánamo detainees who are to be charged with central roles in the
Sept. 11 terror attacks, government officials who have been briefed
on the charges said Sunday.

The officials said the charges would be announced at the Pentagon as
soon as Monday and were likely to include numerous war-crimes charges
against the six men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the former
Qaeda operations chief who has described himself as the mastermind of
the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

A Defense Department official said prosecutors were seeking the death
penalty because "if any case warrants it, it would be for individuals
who were parties to a crime of that scale." The officials spoke
anonymously because no one in the government was authorized to speak
about the case.

A decision to seek the death penalty would increase the international
focus on the case and present new challenges to the troubled military
commission system that has yet to begin a single trial.

"The system hasn't been able to handle the less-complicated cases it
has been presented with to date," said David Glazier, a former Navy
officer who is a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

In addition to Mr. Mohammed, the other five to be charged include
detainees officials say were coordinators and intermediaries in the
plot, among them a man labeled the "20th hijacker," who was denied
entry to the United States in the month before the attacks.

Under the rules of the Guantánamo war-crimes system, the military
prosecutors can designate charges as capital when they present them,
and it is that first phase of the process that is expected this week.
The military official who then reviews them, Susan J. Crawford, a
former military appeals court judge, has the authority to accept or
reject a death-penalty request.

A Pentagon spokesman declined to comment on Sunday.

Some officials briefed on the case have said the prosecutors view
their task in seeking convictions for the Sept. 11 attacks as a
historic challenge. A special group of military and Justice
Department lawyers has been working on the case for several years.

Even if the detainees are convicted on capital charges, any execution
would be many months or, perhaps years, from being carried out,
lawyers said, in part because a death sentence would have to be
scrutinized by civilian appeals courts.

Federal officials have said in recent months that there is no death
chamber at the detention camp at the United States naval base at
Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and that they knew of no specific plans for how
a death sentence would be carried out.

The military justice system, which does not govern the Guantánamo
cases, provides for execution by lethal injection in death sentence
convictions. But the United States military has rarely executed a
prisoner in recent times.

The last military execution was in 1961, when an Army private, John
A. Bennett, was hanged after being convicted of rape and attempted
murder. Currently, there are six service members appealing military
death sentences, according to a recently published article by a
lawyer who specializes in military capital cases, Dwight H. Sullivan,
a former chief military defense lawyer at Guántanamo.

One official who had been briefed on the war-crimes case said the
charges were expected to be lodged against six detainees held at
Guantánamo, including Mr. Mohammed, who is said to have presented the
idea of an airliner attack on the United States to Osama bin Laden in
1999 and then coordinated its planning.

The official identified the others to be charged as Mohammed al-
Qahtani, the man officials have labeled the 20th hijacker; Ramzi bin
al-Shibh, said to have been the main intermediary between the
hijackers and leaders of Al Qaeda; Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, known as
Ammar al-Baluchi, a nephew of Mr. Mohammed, who has been identified
as Mr. Mohammed’s lieutenant for the 2001 operation; Mr. al-Baluchi’s
assistant, Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi; and Walid bin Attash, a detainee
known as Khallad, who investigators say selected and trained some of
the hijackers.

Relatives of the Sept. 11 victims have expressed differing views of
potential death sentences, with some arguing that it would accomplish
little other than martyring men for whom martyrdom may be viewed as a
reward.

But on Sunday, Debra Burlingame, whose brother Charles F. Burlingame
III was the pilot of the hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 that
was crashed into the Pentagon, said she would approve of an effort by
prosecutors to seek the execution of men she blames for killing her
brother. Ms. Burlingame said such a case could help refocus the
public’s attention on what she called the calculated brutality of the
attacks, which she said has been largely forgotten.

"My opinion is," she said, "if the death of 3,000 people isn't
sufficient for a death penalty in this country, then why do we even
have the death penalty?"

Lawyers said a prosecution move to seek the death penalty in 6
cases that will draw worldwide attention was risky. They said it
would increase the stakes at Guantánamo partly by amplifying the
attention internationally to cases that would draw intense attention
in any event.

The military commission system has been troubled almost from the
start, when it was set up in an order by President Bush in November
2001. It has been beset by legal challenges and practical
difficulties, including a 2006 decision by the Supreme Court striking
down the administration’s first system at Guantánamo. Although
officials have spoken of charging 80 or more detainees with war
crimes, so far only one case has been completed, and that was through
a plea bargain.

Eric M. Freedman, a Hofstra University law professor who has been a
consultant to detainees' lawyers, said a decision to seek the death
penalty would magnify the attention on each of the many steps in a
capital case. Intense scrutiny, he said, “would be drawn to the
proceedings both legally and politically from around the world."

Some countries have been critical of the United States' use of the
death penalty in civilian cases, and a request for execution in the
military commission system would import much of that criticism to the
already heated debates about the legitimacy of Guantánamo and the
Bush administration’s legal approach there, some lawyers said.

Tom Fleener, an Army Reserve major who was until recently a military
defense lawyer at Guantánamo, said that bringing death penalty cases
in the military commission system would bog down the untested system.
He noted that many legal questions remain unanswered at Guantánamo,
including how much of the trials will be conducted in closed, secret
proceedings; how the military judges will handle evidence obtained by
interrogators’ coercive tactics; and whether the judges will require
experienced death-penalty lawyers to take part in such cases.

"Neither the system is ready, nor are the defense attorneys ready to
do a death penalty case in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba," Major Fleener said.

Professor Glazier of Loyola said the military commission system was
devised to avoid many of the hurdles that have slowed civilian
capital cases. Still, he said, he expected intense scrutiny and
criticism of such cases that could slow proceedings.

In any event, vigorous trial battles and appeals would probably mean
that no execution would be imminent. "It certainly seems impossible
to get this done by the end of the Bush administration," Professor
Glazier said.

(source:   New York Times)