Nov. 30


IRAN:

Jailed Iran Pastor Facing Death In Prison, Christians Warn


Pastor Irani has been held in one of Iran's toughest jails.

Iranian Christians and rights activists say a jailed Iranian pastor is facing serious health problems and may not survive the remaining 5 years of his prison term on "trumped-up charges" of "crimes against national security".

Pastor Behnam Irani, 41, reportedly lost about 5 kilograms as he fights a blood infection.Iranian Christians have told BosNewsLife that he was previously beaten by fellow inmates and guards of the Ghezel Hesar Prison in Karaj city, one of the toughest jails in the country, some 20 kilometers (12 miles) west of the nation's capital Tehran.

Rights activists with close knowledge about the pastor's situation said he was in "Ward 2 of Salon 7" where each of the 15 square-meter cells hold up to 40 prisoners. "There are only 6 bathrooms for 600 inmates," added advocacy group Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW).

NO HEATING

Earlier this month, "the heating system broke [and] there is no hot water for showers and at night it's just a few degrees above freezing," CSW said in comments seen by BosNewsLife Friday, November 30.

Amid the difficulties, the pastor has been denied adequate medical treatment "for his deteriorating health" and for injuries sustained from "frequent and brutal beatings by prison guards and other inmates" since his imprisonment in May last year, CSW and other sources said.

Acute stomach ulcers and colon complications have reportedly caused severe bleeding, and he is now barely able to walk.

"If he does not get the medical treatment he needs soon, he may die in prison," CSW warned.

LONGER DETENTION

Iranian officials are not known to have commented on the latest developments, but in the past they efended the detention of Christians for allegedly violating laws of the strict Islamic nation.

Irani began a 1-year prison term in 2011 but was later told he would also have to serve a five-year, previously suspended, sentence for "crimes against national security".

There is also concern about a court verdict suggesting prosecutors to pursue the death penalty for "apostasy", said Firouz Khandjani, a council member of the 'Church of Iran' movement to which the pastor belongs.

Christians have linked the sentence to Irani's Christian activities as an effective evangelical pastor of a 300-strong house church congregation.

MANY DETAINED

Hundreds of other evangelical Christians have also been detained, though many were later released after promising not to return to their churches or groups, Khandjani told BosNewsLife.

Though at least dozens of Christians remain detained throughout the country, house churches continue to grow. There may be at least 100,000 devoted Christians in the strict Islamic nation, according to church groups, with some giving higher estimates.

"The international community must take a stand" as "Iran???s regime is increasingly intolerant of religious minorities," commented CSW.

"It is more and more vital for the international community to take action to persuade the Iranian regime to end the mistreatment of all prisoners of conscience."

The group said it has been asking supporters to send a messages to the Iranian government "demanding urgent medical treatment for Pastor Irani and to demand his release from unjust imprisonment."

(source: BosNewsLife)






PAKISTAN:

In favour of capital punishment; In our society people want retributtion. If offenders aren't punished proportionately, people settle scores themselves.


Mr Saroop Ijaz's thought-provoking piece on the death penalty, titlted "Stop the machinery of death" (November 18) provides an alternative aspect of a very important penal policy issue. While the arguments make a lot of sense, there are certain very important factors which must be kept in mind before doing away with capital punishment entirely.

There are 3 elementary questions which each penal jurisdiction requires to be settled and they are: what to punish, how to punish and how much to punish. First, the state declares certain acts as offences carrying a punitive sanction. Then, there are various incarcerating or non-incarcerating punishments and finally, the quantum of punishment is decided based on mitigating factors. Assuming that every murder is punishable by a death sentence is an erroneous presumption as investigators, lawyers and judges ponder each and every aspect before awarding capital punishment. The law also provides for grave and sudden provocation, right of self-defence, etc, awarding lesser punishments keeping all contributing factors in mind.

Without going into any moral or dogmatic assertion on principles of the penal policy, even though morality is inextricably linked with punitive sanctions prevalent in a society, there are 4 major components of a penal policy: deterrence, incapacitation, retribution and rehabilitation.

Let us now examine the capital punishment in our peculiar environment. Pakistan is a semi-tribal society where the expenditure on law and order is next to nothing. According to the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 13,860 people were murdered in Pakistan in 2011, which is a 30 per cent increase since 2006. This rate is extremely high and police investigation is not of high quality. There is no forensic evidence collection or subsequent prosecution. The police resources and training to combat violent crimes are insufficient. In these circumstances, if the capital punishment is revoked, it will have a catastrophic effect on the criminal justice system. It may well be argued that the absence of better and more scientific investigative techniques is all the more reason for the abolition of capital punishment. The objective reality on ground is that the judges only award death punishment in cases where the evidence is overwhelming. In most cases, life imprisonment is imparted.

One of the main absentees of the criminal justice system is the victim. The presumption that the state will act on behalf of the victim removes the emotional aspect of victimology from the discourse. In a tribal society like ours, people want retribution more than other consideration. In case the offenders are not punished in the proportionate manner, people take law into their own hands to settle scores. Before forming opinions, it is extremely important to conduct a survey of the victims to ascertain how they view the matter.

It may sound a bit callous but the reality remains that we are a country of huge population with meagre resources. While in West, governments can afford to keep inmates locked up for extensive periods of time, we have overcrowded prisons. The living conditions in prisons are also quite dismal. Our population needs education, housing, health care, energy and above all, food security. Keeping murderers in prisons for 20 odd years carries a cost which very few in the country are prepared to pay.

Public opinion in Pakistan should also be gauged before embarking on the journey to abolish capital punishment. The religious mafia has to be dealt with at the very onset. There is little room for reason there. Sadly the liberals of our country are also in the habit of picking Western ideas and start campaigning for their adoption. While there is no harm in adopting fresh ideas and modern concepts, some thought must be given to the ground realities and our own societal framework. While Mr Saroop Ijaz's article initiates the debate, other dissenting voices must also be heard and given due deliberation in order to find solutions to a very important penal policy issue.

(source: Tariq Abbas Qureshi, The Express Tribune)






ASIA:

Asia moving away from the death penalty; Mabel Au says although there are exceptions, Asian societies are joining the worldwide movement opposing the use of capital punishment


Anti-death-penalty activists worldwide have been taking to the streets to express their commitment to life and opposition to the death penalty. October 10 was World Day Against the Death Penalty, and yesterday more than 30 cities illuminated a symbolic monument to commemorate the 1st abolition of the death penalty by a European state in 1786.

The voices of activists echo the developments recorded by Amnesty International last year, which show that the global trend towards abolition of the death penalty continues. Last year, Amnesty recorded executions in 20 countries; in 2010, it was 23. Progress was made in all parts of the world, including Asia.

Malaysia has announced it will consider replacing the mandatory death penalty for drug offences with prison sentences. Most of the estimated 900 death-row prisoners have been sentenced for drug offences. Under Malaysian law, the death penalty is mandatory for murder and drug trafficking. Mandatory death sentences, which prevent judges using discretion, are contrary to international human rights standards.

Singapore has proposed amendments to replace the mandatory death penalty with discretionary sentencing in some cases, such as where suspects co-operate substantively with investigations.

Beijing has eliminated the death penalty for 13 non-violent economic crimes, and China's Criminal Procedure Law has been amended, introducing new procedures enhancing access to legal aid, requiring the recording of interrogations and introducing mandatory appellate hearings and more rigorous review processes in death penalty cases.

Mongolia confirmed its moratorium on the use of the death penalty in January.

The extent of progress in Asia should not be overemphasised. The Malaysian government's proposed review of the death penalty extends only to drug-trafficking cases. In Singapore, one proposal is to make drug traffickers liable to caning instead.

In China, the death penalty remains for other non-violent crimes, such as corruption and drug trafficking, and the circumstances under which a death sentence may be imposed for producing and selling fake drugs or poisonous or harmful foodstuffs have been widened. People facing the death penalty in China continue to face unfair trials.

Nevertheless, opposition to the death penalty is steadily growing in Asia, with societies increasingly questioning the legitimacy of capital punishment. Last year, a seminar on the reform of the death penalty was organised in China, and this year two seminars aimed at the progressive abolition of the death penalty in Asia have been held in Hong Kong.

Progress towards limiting the use of the death penalty in Asia is uneven, with frequent setbacks, but it mirrors the global trend towards abolition. On November 19, the UN General Assembly's human rights committee adopted its 4th draft resolution calling for a global moratorium on executions. The resolution was co-sponsored by 91 states, the highest number yet. Reflecting changing attitudes towards the death penalty in Asia, Afghanistan, Papua New Guinea and Indonesia - all previous opponents of a global moratorium - moved from opposition to abstention when voting.

(source: Mabel Au Mei-po is the director of Amnesty International Hong Kong section; South China Morning Post)






ZIMBABWE:

Zimbabwe to appear at the Vatican over death penalty


Zimbabwe is appearing at the Vatican City to answer questions on why it still maintains the death penalty law in its statute books together with about 20 other countries around the world who still do so.

Co-Minister of Home Affairs Theresa Makone told Radio VOP that she will be attending the meeting in Rome to hear the Vatican???s view on death penalty and argue the case for Zimbabwe.

The Catholic Church has been calling for the abolition of death penalty around the world and in countries that the church has a presence.

"I shall be in Rome between 29 and 30 November where I will be talking about the death sentence in Zimbabwe. There is a department of the Saint'Egidio Community within the Roman Catholic Church which wants to hear from about 20 odd countries around the world which still maintain death penalty," said Makone.

The Saint'Egidio Community seeks to encourage people around the world to campaign for the end of death penalty.

Zimbabwe still maintains the death penalty although a proposed new constitution for the country abolished it in respect of women, children under the age of 18 and senior citizens aged above 70 years.

"When I joined the unity government I was given a list of people on death row that should get a presidential pardon. I said these people must be hanged but the president said we will give you the job to hang them but I told him I don't want to kill so no-one has the right to kill because that is up to God because he is our creator," said Makone.

Speaking to the Catholic News ahead of the meeting, Pope Benedict XVI encouraged delegates to the meeting to promote the abolition of the death penalty and lobby for political and legislative initiatives that eliminate death penalty.

(source: The Zimbabwean)






CHINA:

Death penalty for Chinese man who held 6 "sex slaves," killed 2


A man in central China was sentenced to death Friday for keeping 6 women as sex slaves in a cellar for months and killing 2 of them, a case that shook the Asian nation last year.

A court in Luoyang, a city in the central province of Henan, convicted Li Hao, 35, of rape, murder, organized prostitution, illegal detention and distribution of pornography.

The court also sentenced one of the captives to three years in prison and released 2 others on bail on grounds that they helped Li commit the murders, though the fact that they might have done so under threat from their captor was considered an extenuating circumstance by the judges.

Li, a local government official, kept the women locked up in 2 rooms measuring 2 sq. meters (21 sq. feet) each that he himself had dug under a cellar near his home, where he raped them repeatedly and forced them to perform in pornographic videos that he then aired on the Internet, until his arrest in September 2011.

The women were kidnapped by Li from night spots and karaoke clubs - the 1st of them spent 21 months in captivity, the last was locked up for 2 months.

In order to terrify them, the accused killed 2 of the women who stood up to him and buried their bodies in a shallow grave in the same cellar.

The other captives were fed just once every other day to weaken them physically, and were not allowed outside the cellar except to work as prostitutes and subsequently hand over the money to the man now condemned to death.

During one such temporary release, however, one of the victims, 24, managed to escape and ran to the police.

Li has a 1-year-old son with his wife, who had no idea about his hideous practices until he was arrested, and needed psychological help after learning the truth.

(source: Fox News)






JAPAN:

Majority support for death penalty questioned by professor


The Japanese government intentionally swells support for the death penalty in its opinion surveys, stated an information science professor at Shizuoka University.

Professor Fumiyasu Yamada said on Tuesday (November 27th) that of those 80 % of the public who support the death penalty, a large segment of them would also support abolishing it in the future.

"It has been reported that more than 80 % approve the death penalty, but seen from an informatics perspective, it is unreasonable to make such a generalisation," explained the expert as reported in Kyodo News.

Mr Yamada refers to the Cabinet Office December 2009 survey where 85.6 % of the respondents agreed that under particular situations, the capital punishment is necessary.

Another 5.7 % responded that in all circumstances, the death penalty should be abolished and 8.6 % stated that were unsure either way.

The professor noted that the survey was biased, referring to the phraseology used, such as "should be abolished in all circumstances", explaining that the language is "too strong" and makes choosing it more difficult for people.

(source: Inside Japan News Network)

_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/deathpenalty@lists.washlaw.edu/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to