March 2



THAILAND:

Koh Tao Defense Team to File Appeal With Thai Supreme Court


The legal defense team representing the 2 Burmese migrant workers sentenced to death for the 2014 murder and rape of 2 Britons in Thailand's Koh Tao island, will next file an appeal with the Thai Supreme Court, after being rejected in the appeal court.

U Kyaw Thaung, a member of the men's defense team, said, they have been discussing when to submit the next appeal, to Thailand's highest court. "We will do so within the next week," he told The Irrawaddy.

The defense team said they were not formally informed about the ruling in this very controversial case, in which the 2 men, Win Zaw Htun and Zaw Lin, received the death penalty for charges they have denied, involving the deaths of British nationals Hannah Witheridge, 23, and David Miller, 24.

The verdict was handed down by the Koh Samui Township Court in December 2015, and the 2 men lost their appeal to the District Court of Appeal in March 2017.

The appeal was nearly 200 pages long and argued that the DNA evidence which led to the conviction was inadmissible and had not been "collected, tested, analyzed or reported in accordance with internationally accepted standards," Reuters reported.

U Htoo Chit, the director of the Foundation for Education Development - an organization providing outreach to migrant workers in Thailand - said, "the Lawyer's Council of Thailand - the legal body assisting the Burmese defense team - was not officially informed about the verdict of the appeal. But we will consult with the defense lawyers to keep our appeal in accordance with the Thai judicial system."

"Also we learned that Win Zaw Htun and Zaw Lin were not properly informed through the translator, either," he added. "But the District Court of Appeal upheld the verdict of the [Koh Samui] township criminal court ruling."

It was not clear when the Appeal Court's verdict was made, but it was known publicly after being published in Thai media on Wednesday afternoon, said the defense team members.

(source: irrawaddy.com)






INDIA:

India Sentenced To Death Twice As Many People In 2016 As In The Previous Year----However the Supreme Court is growing less likely to confirm death sentences.


Sessions courts handed down nearly twice as many death sentences in 2016 as compared to 2015, new data for 2016 compiled by the Centre on the Death Penalty at the National Law University Delhi shows.

Over half of the 136 death sentences in 2016 (70 in 2015) were for murder simpliciter, in which the accused was convicted for murder only. In all, sessions courts have handed down 1,790 death sentences between 2000 and 2015.

Despite the Supreme Court in 2015 making it clear that death warrants - an order by a court that has issued a death sentence specifying the time and date that the execution is to be carried out - are not to be issued in haste, secrecy or before the accused has exhausted all his or her legal options, the report found that Sessions courts issued 5 death warrants in 2016 before the accused had exhausted their legal options. These were later cancelled by higher courts.

High Courts confirmed 15 death sentences in 2016 (handed down by sessions courts in earlier years), commuted the sentences of 44 convicts and acquitted 14 people.

The most significant change came at the level of the Supreme Court - of the 7 criminal appeals on the death penalty that came before it in 2016, the SC confirmed none (it did however confirm one death sentence at the review petition stage). This was a notable departure from the previous year, when the SC 8 of 9 appeals that came before it. Seventy-one criminal appeals on the death penalty are still pending before the SC.

President Pranab Mukherjee disposed of 6 mercy petitions in 2016, rejecting 5 and commuting to life one in a case that was confirmed by the SC in 2000, leaving the convict, Jeetendra Singh Gehlot, with no idea of his fate for 16 years.

There were 397 people in all on death row at the end of 2016, 11 of them sentenced under the Army Act and little was know of their status.

Despite being the harshest possible punishment, the administration of the death penalty in India remains shrouded in mystery.

"It is almost impossible to state with any kind of certainty the number of death sentences handed out in any given year or even know the exact number of prisoners under the sentence of death at any given point," the researchers noted. "Additionally, the fact that there exists no reliable data even on the number of executions carried out in independent India speaks to the opacity that surrounds the death penalty," they wrote.

The researchers used RTI applications, official data from some courts, court judgement data and news reports to compile the report.

(source: huffingtonpost.in)






GHANA:

Emile Short Calls for the Abolishment of Death Penalty


The Former Commissioner on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) Justice Emile Short has suggested that death penalty should be abolished from the country's statutory books.

According to him, death penalty does not serve as a deterrent to people who commit crimes.

Speaking on Ultimate Breakfast Show hosted by Lantam Papanko, Justice Short bemoaned the horrific treatment suspects slapped with death penalty go through in prisons.

According to him, conditions at the cells will be a lot better if death penalty is abolished and suspects are rather given life imprisonment.

'There is the need for the National Commission on Civic Education (NCCE), CHRAJ and the media to sensitise people to understand that it is imperative to abolish death penalty,' he suggested.

He called on the government to revive the constitutional review commission which recommended its abolishing.

'There is no doubt that death penalty should be abolished. As a country, we don't believe in carrying out death penalty but its just in our statutory books. The constitutional review commission recommended that it should be abolished. And government white paper accepted that, so its only left for the implementation of the recommendation which requires a referendum,' he opined.

Touching on instant justice, the Former Commissioner of CHRAJ suggested that persons involved in the acts without resorting to the law should be prosecuted.

He believes this will serve as deterrent to offenders who beat suspected thieves to death.

Justice Short said it is inhumane to subject suspects to severe beatings which lead to death.

'I think its most unfortunate, its despicable act, in a country where we believe in the rule of law and respect for human rights such incidence should not happen, everybody is innocent until proven guilty, the law must take its cause, its not for individuals to take the laws into their own hands. I don't know the mentality of those who commit do such acts, the bestial instincts in some people which give rise to such acts, I think we need to condemn it in no uncertain terms,' he said.

(source: newsghana.com.gh)

*****************

Death penalty is a human rights violation


The Acting Director of Amnesty International, Mr. Frank Doyi is advocating for the death penalty to be scrapped from the constitution because it is a human rights violation.

According to him, Ghanaians have demonstrated time and again that the death penalty is not something that they want it in the constitution and it is reasonable enough to scrap it.

We cannot have a constitution that provides for the enjoyment of life and at the same time gives power for that same life to be taken. Ghanaians are asking for the death penalty to be repealed and all that government needs is the political will to do that," Mr. Doyi explained.

Discussing the latest report released by Amnesty International calling for women and children rights to be respected and protected on 'State of Affairs' on GHONE TV, Mr. Doyi explained that the report is aimed at addressing the copious human rights infractions in Ghana to enable Ghanaians to fully enjoy their freedom and democratic values.

He described the conditions at the various prisons in the country as unfortunate and inappropriate. In his view, government must endeavour to improve the prisons to serve its purpose as a rehab centre where people who go there are rehabilitated and reinstated in society.

"Regardless of who you are or your status, you can be in prison. It could be you and it could be me. So all that we are saying is that lets upgrade the prisons. The heat, the congestion, the diseases and manhandling in the prisons are all human rights violations which should be avoided."

Mr. Doyi acknowledged that one of the best ways to reduce congestion in the prisons is to avoid non-custodial sentences.

A Senior Lecturer, Law Faculty, University of Ghana,Dr. Kwadwo Appiagyei-Attuah who was also on the program shared similar sentiments and advised government to dispel the notion that if it softens its stance on criminals and evil doers in society, violence escalate and see reforming the prisons as an urgent priority.

"Perhaps government thinks that making the prisons better will entice more wrong doers in the country that is why it has kept the current status of the prisons intact. But exposing inmates to overheating, congestion and all that is also a violation of their human rights because it leaves them with psychological trauma," Dr. Appiagyei-Attuah posited.

In his estimation, improving conditions in the prisons will require money and advised government to be innovative enough to raise the funds for the project even if it doesn't have the money because the country is lagging behind in terms of the UN standards for conditions in the prisons.

They both called on the government to speed up the implementation of the Rights to Information Bill. This they believe will keep Ghanaians well informed to participate in National discourse and make meaningful contributions to the country's development.

(source: ghanaweb.com)






UNITED NATIONS:

Capital punishment should be abolished - UN


The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Al Hussein, has reiterated his call for the abolition of death penalty saying its subjecting convicts to mental anguish constitutes human rights violations.

Zeid made the call on Wednesday at the opening of the biennial high-level panel discussion on the death penalty, which was organized as part of the Human Rights Council's session for 2017.

He explained that capital punishment raised serious issues in relation to the dignity and rights of all human beings, including the right to life and the right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

"International and national bodies have determined that several methods of execution are likely to violate the prohibition of torture because of the pain and suffering they are likely to inflict on the convicted person.

"Studies of the severe pain and suffering caused by other methods has continued to extend this list, to the point where it has become increasingly difficult for a State to impose the death penalty without violating international human rights law," Zeid said.

He pointed out the long and highly stressful period that most individuals endure while waiting on death row for years, or even decades, and frequently in isolation, for an uncertain outcome.

According to him, such situation has also been referenced as constituting torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

"This 'death row phenomenon' has been recognized by the UN Human Rights Committee and other bodies at the international, regional and domestic levels, as well as by the California Supreme Court.

"When the authorities fail to give adequate information about the timing of executions, they keep not only the convicted person but also his children and other family members in permanent anticipation of imminent death, he explained.

"The severe mental and physical suffering which are inflicted by capital punishment on the person concerned and family members should now be added to the weight of the argument.

"This is another reason why the death penalty should be abolished, besides its capricious and often discriminatory application and its failure to demonstrate any deterrent effect beyond that of other punishments."

The UN rights chief recalled that a former Special Rapporteur had recommended that the Human Rights Council request a comprehensive legal study regarding the emergence of a customary norm according to which the death penalty constitutes torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Zeid said it has been 10 years since the UN General Assembly resolution of December 2007, which urged States to adopt a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, with a view towards its full abolition.

The UN rights chief said over this decade, the global trend against capital punishment has become increasingly strong, with almost 3 out of 4 countries now having either abolished it or stopped practicing it.

"However, the overall number of executions in States that continue to resort to the death penalty has increased in the last 2 years, and some States in which a moratorium had been in place for many years have recently resumed executions.

"I take this opportunity, once again to urge all States to end use of the death penalty," Zeid said.

(source: thenewsnigeria.com.ng)


CHINA:

Colombia protests execution of 72-year-old drug mule


A retired journalist who joined the criminal underworld while researching a book on South America's drug cartels became the 1st Colombian, and possibly the 1st Latin American, to be executed in China for drug offenses.

The execution Monday night of Ismael Arciniegas occurred amid a last-ditch diplomatic effort by Colombia's government to save the 72-year-old's life. Arciniegas was arrested in 2010 arriving by plane to the southern port city of Guangzhou trying to smuggle almost 4 kilograms of cocaine in exchange for USD5,000.

But his downfall came decades earlier, in the 1980s, when he began researching a book on drug cartels in his native Cali, according to his son, Juan Jose Herrera, who described to local media the heart-breaking, 20-minute phone conversation he and family members had with his father shortly before he was taken to a room to be killed by lethal injection.

"God has opened his gates for me," a calm Arciniegas said in the tear-filled conversation, an excerpt of which was broadcast by Blu Radio. "Remember me warmly, with love. I'm going very tranquil, very relaxed. Nothing worries me."

Colombia's government expressed its condolences to Arciniegas' family and reiterated its objection to China's use of capital punishment. Since November, China has repatriated 2 convicted Colombian drug traffickers for humanitarian reasons so they could complete their sentences back home.

"We fought until the last minute to save his life," the foreign ministry said in a statement, adding that it was making arrangements to repatriate Arciniegas' ashes to his family in Cali.

The execution threatens to strain relations between the 2 important commercial partners because, according to Colombian officials, there are 15 more people from the South American country on death row in China and an equal number sentenced to life imprisonment. Both punishments are illegal in Colombia.

But while news of Arciniegas' death dominated social media in Colombia on Tuesday an online survey by Blu of almost 5,000 people showed 52 % in agreement with the harsh punishment.

China is the world's top executioner, although it's unclear how many foreigners have been sentenced to death in China for drugs or other offenses. A Chinese state media report said in 2015 that a dozen foreign people had been sentenced to death after being convicted of drug dealing. Most were from Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia, the report said.

Chinese law states that anyone convicted of smuggling, selling, transporting or producing more than 1 kilogram of opium, or 50 grams of methamphetamine or heroin, or a large amount of other drugs, could face the death penalty.

"Chinese judicial authorities have been cracking down in accordance with law," Geng Shuang, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a briefing Tuesday when asked about Arciniegas??? execution. "China always attaches importance to the protection of human rights and the right of life. The legitimate right and interest of the individual involved in the case has been guaranteed."

Colombia is the world's largest producer of cocaine, a phenomenon that since the days of Pablo Escobar has generated eye-popping fortunes but also afflicted countless numbers of poor families drawn to the drug trade with the promise of easy money. More than 8,500 Colombians are being held in jails around the world for drug trafficking, including 146 in China, authorities said.

Herrera said his family was especially cursed.

His father was imprisoned for drug offenses when he was born, his mother died of an overdose when he was 2 years old and a brother was killed a few years ago by unknown assassins in Cali, one of the cities that is most-ravaged by drug trafficking. His uncle, Arciniegas' brother, was also arrested trying to sneak drugs into China and died in jail there of a stroke in 2013.

Herrera said his father's bookish background - he spoke several foreign languages and was an obsessive writer - made him an attractive drug mule to criminals he met in the 1980s while researching a never-published book, to be called "Satanic War," about the damage caused Colombia by the drug war. Shortly after, he amassed a small fortune but later saw his riches and contact with his family all but disappear when he was jailed in Colombia.

When he traveled to China in 2010, he had fallen on hard times and was trying to rebuild.

"They filled him with greed and led him to make a mistake that cost him his life," Herrera, who has a tattoo of his father's face on his chest, told Blu. "He was only a pawn in the game."

(source: Macau Daily Times)






MALAYSIA----2 women, foreign nationals, face death penalty

2 face gallows over murder


Vietnamese Doan Thi Huong and Indonesian Siti Aisyah are facing the gallows for the alleged murder of a North Korean on Feb 13. The women were charged under Section 302 of the Penal Code that carries the mandatory death penalty upon conviction. The charge was read together with Section 34 of the same Code.

Siti Aisyah was the 1st to appear before the magistrate's court here yesterday.

In the charge sheet, she was accused, together with four men still at large, of murdering a "Kim Chol" at the KLIA2 departure hall in Sepang.

"Kim Chol" is the name that Kim Jong-nam, the half-brother of the country's leader Kim Jong-un, usually travels under.

Siti allegedly committed the offence at 9am on Feb 13. The charge was read out to her in Bahasa Indonesia through an interpreter.

She nodded, signalling that she understood the charge. No plea was recorded.

DPP Muhamad Iskandar Ahmad asked the court for 1 1/2 months to get all the relevant documents before the case is transferred to the Shah Alam High Court.

Lawyer Gooi Soon Seng, who represented Siti, applied for the court to grant a gag order against the police and potential witnesses from issuing statements to the press that could incriminate or compromise his client's case.

"This application is to ensure her right to a fair trial is not compromised. Those statements are sub judice," Gooi said.

Sessions Court judge Harith Sham Mohamed Yasin, sitting as a magistrate, granted the gag order and fixed April 13 for mention.

After Siti was led out of the courtroom, Doan was brought out before the judge.

She was charged, together with 4 men still at large, with the same offence, at the same time. Her charge was read out in Vietnamese.

Doan said she understood the charge. No plea was recorded. She was represented by lawyer S. Selvam.

DPP Muhammad Iskandar asked for a joint trial for both cases at the Shah Alam High Court. The court allowed the application and fixed April 13 for mention.

Representatives from Indonesian and Vietnamese embassies were in court, including Indonesian deputy ambassador to Malaysia Andreano Erwin.

Earlier before the charging, both women were brought to the KLIA2 to have their identities confirmed.

The police took their photos at the site of the killing to compare this with the CCTV footage. Doan appeared calm throughout the 30-minute process.

Jong-nam was killed at KLIA2 on Feb 13 after 2 women smeared him with a chemical that has since been identified as the VX nerve agent.

Doan was arrested on Feb 15 as she was attempting to catch a flight back to Vietnam, while Siti was detained early the next day.

Police have also arrested a 3rd suspect, North Korean citizen Ri Jong-chol, and are seeking 3 more men, including North Korean embassy second secretary Hyon Kwang-song.

Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohamad Apandi Ali said Ri, 47, was still being investigated by police and would make a decision by tomorrow on whether to charge him.

(source: thestar.com.my)






PHILIPPINES:

House OKs death to drug dealers


Through a "shouting match," the House of Representatives approved on 2nd reading Wednesday House Bill 4727, a watered-down death penalty bill imposing capital punishment only on drug manufacturing and trafficking.

With the "viva voce" vote, there was no official tally as those for or against the divisive measure only had to shout "aye" or "nay."

Deputy Majority Leader Juan Pablo Bondoc moved for the approval of the bill on 2nd reading around 7:30 p.m., and Deputy Speaker Raneo Abu of Batangas ruled that the ayes had it.

Bondoc rushed to end the period of amendments to block Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, who repeatedly proposed amendments to remove death penalty as punishment for any crime.

Rep. Reynaldo Umali of Oriental Mindoro, the House justice committee chairman, rejected Lagman's proposed amendments at every turn for 2 hours.

Lagman's persistence on his amendments that would render the death penalty useless prevented Rep. Harry Roque of Kabayan party-list from proposing lethal injection as the sole mode of execution and introducing a sunset provision that would have limited the implementation of death penalty until noon of June 30, 2022 or the end of the term of President Rodrigo Duterte, who pledged to bring back capital punishment in the 2016 campaign.

Roque gave his colleagues the heads up on his proposed amendment on lethal injection before yielding the floor to Lagman. In the end, Bondoc did not allow Roque to propose any amendment.

The bill proceeds to a vote on third reading. The Senate has yet to pass its own version of the bill.

No nominal voting

Lagman and his fellow anti-death penalty lawmakers Rav Rocamora of Siquijor, Tom Villarin of Akbayan, Jose Atienza of Buhay party-list repeatedly moved for nominal voting - with each member saying yes or no on the podium - on the amendments and on second reading approval, but were defeated.

Atienza vowed to question the vote in court, and wondered why the House Super Majority coalition rushed to pass the bill on 2nd reading.

Only 28 lawmakers favored nominal voting, short of the required 1/5.

Not all of the Liberal Party's 32 members voted for nominal voting that could have stalled the approval of the death penalty bill. The erstwhile ruling party had previously vowed to block the measure.

Among the 28 lawmakers who favored nominal voting were Makabayan bloc lawmakers from party-list groups Bayan Muna, Gabriela, Alliance of Concerned Teachers, Kabataan and Anakpawis.

50-50 in the Senate

Senate Majority leader Vicente Sotto 3rd admitted on Wednesday there was a "50-50" chance of getting the proposal to re-impose death penalty in the country passed in the chamber, but said more senators might change their position if proponents of the bill agree to limit its scope.

"We were able to get some senators to support the revival of the death penalty because I agreed to limit it to high-level drug trafficking," he added.

"But if you are a pusher caught with a kilo of shabu, you will not be qualified," he added.

Senator Paolo Benigno Aquino 4th said the proposal to revive death penalty would be seriously debated in the plenary.

"The minority will play an active role in the debates and we will make sure that counter perspectives are given a space in the Senate," said Aquino, the new deputy minority leader.

The Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights had started hearing proposals to restore the death penalty, but the hearings were indefinitely suspended amid worries the country might violate the 1986 Treaty of International Convention on Civil and Political Rights.

The treaty prevents states from carrying out execution as a form of punishment.

Aquino said lawmakers must confer with Foreign Affairs officials regarding international treaties in connection with the bill.

But Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre 2nd has maintained that while treaties are part of the law of the land, a country can still get out of such agreements, especially when there are compelling reasons.

VACC holds vigil

Members of the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) held a vigil outside the House of Representatives to urge lawmakers to approve the death penalty on heinous crimes, not just drug manufacture and trade.

Some members of the anti-crime group held up pictures of massacre and murder victims.

"We are pro-death penalty. We believe that having death penalty will reduce the number of those committing violence, especially those who commit murder, rape...the same goes for corruption so we also want plunderers to be included," VACC chief coordinator Rose Roque said.

VACC founding chairman Dante Jimenez told The Manila Times: "I hope that if the House approves the death penalty bill tonight, the Senate will support also the death penalty to help the victims of heinous crimes in their quest for genuine justice."

He cited the terrorist Abu Sayyaf Group's beheading of a German hostage. "I hope our lawmakers will wake up because if this happens to them, what will their families say about the death penalty? Jimenez said.

(source: Manila Times)

*********************

Ateneo de Manila students walk out of classes to reject death penalty bill----The university's student government leads the walk out after an overwhelming majority in the House of Representatives approved the death penalty bill on 2nd reading


Hundreds of Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU) students walked out of their classes at 11 am on Thursday, March 2, to protest the approval of House Bill (HB) Number 4727 on second reading in the House of Representatives.

The university's student government organized the protest after a majority in the House passed by a vote of ayes and nays the controversial measure which seeks to reimpose the death penalty for several drug-related crimes.

Legislators gave their nod to House Bill Number 4727 on the same day the Philippines, a predominantly Catholic country, commemorated the start of the Lenten Season on Ash Wednesday.

Students held a short program inside the campus before heading out to Gate 2.5 of the campus to hold a noise barrage and lightning protest.

Some students also dramatized their protest through a tableau that represented injustices in the country.

Divided faculty

The university's faculty was divided on the walkout which disrupted classes. While some gave their wholehearted support, others asked why the students did not hold the protest at 5 pm, when less classes are happening.

On Wednesday night, netizens also took to Twitter their opposition to the death penalty bill as the hashtag #NoToDeathPenalty trended.

A priority legislation of President Rodrigo Duterte, the death penalty measure will only need to go through 3rd and final reading before it is transmitted to the Senate. The House is expected to finally approve the contentious bill on Tuesday, March 7.

(source: rappler.com)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to