Jan. 12



NORTH KOREA:

Korea refuses to abolish National Security Law, death penalty----Liberals decry 'archaic' law on punishing anti-state activities



The government refused to follow U.N. recommendations on the abolishment of one of the most politically divisive legislations which liberals long called an "archaic tool used by right-wing administrations to suppress opposition."

The Ministry of Justice said Wednesday it will not abolish the National Security Law, saying further in-depth review followed by public consensus should precede any abrupt revision to the status quo. The death penalty will not be abolished either, it added.

Under the National Security Law, individuals who praise, incite or propagate the activities of "anti-state bodies" are subject to seven years in prison. Such broad and vaguely worded clauses have long been used to suppress dissent and prosecute individuals who peacefully exercise their freedom of expression and association, by labeling them as "North Korean sympathizers."

"The National Security Law should remain for the country to achieve peaceful reunification as well as to improve human rights of North Korean people," the ministry official was quoted as saying during a press briefing. "Abolishing the death penalty should be determined with great caution after fully reviewing both the positive and negative impact it would have on the criminal justice system."

The announcement came about two months after the United Nations Human Rights Council in its Universal Periodic Review last November asked Korea to submit its policy plans in response to its 218 recommendations. The ministry has until the end of February to respond.

Other than the 2 the ministry said it would follow 85 other recommendations, adding the remaining 130 are under review with plans to establish an institutional framework for their implementation.

The ministry did not give any opinions on the abolishment of the law that punishes conscientious objectors who refuse to serve in the military on religious grounds.

Liberal civic groups protested the ministry's decision, calling it "out of touch" with reality. "The National Security Law was used to persecute many liberals under the former Park Geun-hye administration as well as her conservative predecessors," said an official from the Lawyers for a Democratic Society, a group of liberal lawyers. "Freedom of expression and assembly is a constitutional right which cannot be infringed upon by the government, or any other entities for that matter. It is the bedrock principle in a democratic society. The ministry should change its stance to follow the international body's recommendation."

(source: The Korea Times)








PAKISTAN:

Prisoners' request for painless execution denied



A court has turned down attempts by 2 death row prisoners who wanted the way death sentences are carried out to be changed.

A 2-judge bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) comprising Justice Roohul Amin and Justice Qalandar Ali Khan on Thursday dismissed petitions filed by 2 death row prisoners who have challenged the penalty of "hanging till death" and instead asked for a 'less painful' mode of execution in accordance with modern scientific developments.

PHC dismisses petition against Jhagra

The petitioners, Jan Bahadur and Gul Wali, on death row at the Haripur prison for the past 20 years, had challenged hangings.

"Hanging to death is unIslamic and unconstitutional," Khurshid Khan, the lawyer for the petitioners, told the court. He insisted that it was painful and against human values.

"If you are punishing them according to the English law, why do you not execute them through a modern mode?" he asked, noting that the prisoners preferred to have their sentence carried out through a lethal injection instead of being hanged by their necks.

Bahadur had been sentenced to death by an additional district and sessions judge in Takht Bhai on April 7, 2000, for a 1993 murder. After he challenged the mode of execution in July 2017, a stay was grated on the execution of his sentence.

Wali has been on the death row at the Haripur jail for past 22 years and recently submitted a similar application.

"We are not against the executions, but against the mode of execution in Pakistan, which is a cruel one," Khurshid argued. He added that before the arrival of the British in united India, there was no concept of hanging to death.

He further argued that Article 2 of the constitution provides that no law in the country will be made against Islam.

"As hanging by neck till death is not in accordance with Islamic teachings, therefore it is requested to amend section 368," the petitioners contended. Section 368 of the Pakistan Criminal Procedure Code provides that when "any person is sentenced to death, the sentence shall direct that he be hanged by the neck till he is dead."

Khurshid further argued that the court should seek the viewed of the Council of Islamic Ideology.

LHC CJ inaugurates special court to deal with harassment of women cases

The 2-judge bench, though, dismissed the petitions, on the basis that the matter did not fall within the high court's jurisdiction, rather, it should be taken up with the Federal Shariat Court instead to decide whether or not any law is repugnant to the injunctions of Islam.

"There is no subordination in judicial matters," justice Qalander said.

"If a judgment is upheld by the Supreme Court, then there is no jurisdiction of the High Court. Hanging to death is maintained by the Supreme Court," he maintained.

(source: The Express Tribune)








MALAYSIA:

Ex-Security Guard To Hang For Murdering Dr Rohani, Copulating With Corpse



The convicted murderer of Perak Veterinary Department deputy director Dr Rohani Kassim lost his final bid to escape the gallows after the Federal Court dismissed his appeal against his conviction and death sentence.

In handing down the verdict on Syahmie Hassan, a 5-man bench led by Tun Md Raus Sharif unanimously ruled that after reading the evidence adduced during the trial, they found that there was no reason to interfere with the Court of Appeal's decision which upheld the appellant's conviction and sentence.

Syahmie, 27, a former security guard who had murdered the victim and copulated with the body, was found guilty of the offence by the Ipoh High Court in Perak on July 31, 2015, and was sentenced to death.

He had killed Dr Rohani, 38, inside an apartment unit in Persiaran Lembah Perpaduan, Permai Lake View in Ulu Kinta, Perak, between 6pm and 7.30pm, on Aug 3, 2011.

Evidence showed that he did not only murder Dr Rohani by choking her to death but he then had sex with her corpse after breaking into her apartment.

The other judges who presided were Tan Sri Hasan Lah, Tan Sri Zaharah Ibrahim, Tan Sri Jeffery Tan Kok Wha and Datuk Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin.

Earlier, Syahmie's counsel Hisyam Teh Poh Teik argued that failure on the prosecution's part to call a psychiatrist as witness was perjudicial to his client.

Deputy public prosecutor Faizah Mohd Salleh said the burden of proof in a defence of insanity lies on the appellant, not the prosecution.

On May 18, 2016, the Court of Appeal upheld Syahmie's conviction and death penalty ruling that there was no grounds for insanity.

It was previously reported that the body of a woman wrapped in a thick blanket was found on a staircase.

The suspect at that time was carrying the body to dispose it when he was caught by security guards.

(source: malaysiandigest.com)



INDONESIA:

Mary Jane's fate up to Indonesia



Malacanang has said that the fate of convicted Filipino drug mule Mary Jane Veloso is in the hands of the Indonesian government following her request to President Duterte to let her testify against her recruiters on her 33rd birth anniversary last Jan. 10.

Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque, in a Palace press briefing, said the President's hands are tied since she is detained in a foreign country.

"I don't understand what exactly the President can do in this regard. She is detained in foreign soil because of breach Indonesian penal laws," Roque said.

"She continues to be alive despite being meted the death penalty. But there is such a thing as 'sovereignty,' and the matter is completely in the hands of the Indonesian government," he added.

Roque said that the Indonesian government has been showing clemency since her death was put off.

"I think the Indonesia government, by not carrying out the punishment of death penalty, has shown clemency on a daily basis," he said.

Veloso is on death row and was supposed to be executed by firing squad after smuggling 2.6 kilograms of heroin into Indonesia in 2010. She denied having knowledge about the contraband.

(source: tempo.com.ph)

*************************

Married couple arrested for possession of various drugs



A married couple in their 40s were arrested by the police after various types of drugs worth RM194,976 were found in their apartment at Muara Tabuan yesterday evening.

District police chief ACP Abang Ahmad Abang Julai revealed that Syabu weighing at 613.89 grammes, Erimin 5 (750 tablets / 208.29g) and Ecstacy (140 tablets / 50.18 g) were seized from the couple.

"Both suspects in this case will be investigated under Section 39B of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 for drug trafficking which carries the death penalty if found guilty," said Abang Ahmad to a press conference held at the Kuching district police headquarters this morning.

He said that the male suspect, a 45-year-old Sarawakian showed positive result for methamphetamine in his drug test while the female suspect, a 40-year-old Indonesian produced negative result in her drug test.

"The male suspect have also admitted to be selling drugs starting last year. Both suspects have no past criminal records," he said.

The arrests yesterday, said Abang Ahmad, were conducted by the district's Narcotics Criminal Investigations Department (NCID) led by Inspector Khairul Faiz Zaini based on a public tip-off.

He added that the NCID team first approached the male suspect at the apartment's car park where he willingly handed the police a black satchel containing Syabu weighing at 2.1g and 100 tablets of Erimin 5.

Upon further inquiry, the male suspect then led the police to his apartment unit where the remaining drug stash was kept in a room.

At the apartment, police also found the female suspect who was later arrested for the same offence.

Besides the drugs, the police also seized a sedan car and cash money totalling to RM2,000 from the suspects who are currently under a 7-day remand.

Also present at the press conference were Abang Ahmad's deputies Supt Abang Junaidi Abang Anuar (operations) and Supt Ismail Mahmood (adminstration).

(source: Borneo Post)

****************

Indonesia requests death penalty for 8 Taiwanese----The Indonesian government is getting tougher on drug cases, with 16 Taiwanese sentenced to death or killed in raids in recent years



Indonesian prosecutors have requested the death penalty for 8 Taiwanese allegedly involved in a drug smuggling operation last year.

Tipped off by Taiwanese police, Indonesian police intercepted a record 1 tonne haul of crystal methamphetamine imported from China during a raid in Anyer Beach, west of Jakarta, on July 13 last year.

During the operation, Indonesian police killed a Taiwanese man alleged to be the kingpin of the drug ring, after he refused to surrender, and arrested 3 others, identified as Chen Wei-cyuan, Liao Guan-yu and Hsu Yung-li.


5 more Taiwanese were on July 15 arrested by Indonesian police in connection with the case.

While Chen, Liao and Hsu were responsible for taking delivery of the drugs in Indonesia, the other 5 were responsible for shipping the drugs to Indonesia on a Taiwanese cruise ship, Indonesian prosecutor Abun Hasbullah said.

Hsu was hired to pick up the drugs in Indonesia in exchange for 120 million rupiah (US$8,400), while Liao and Chen each got 80 million rupiah for unloading and packaging the drugs, Abun told a court hearing on Wednesday, during which he asked that the 8 be sentenced to death.

In similar cases in the past, people convicted of trafficking more than 1kg of methamphetamine have usually been given death sentences. As part of its war on drugs, the Indonesian government is increasing the severity of punishments, especially for foreigners.

According to information from the Indonesian government, 11 Taiwanese suspects have been sentenced to death in drug trafficking cases over the past few years, while 5 others have been killed during police operations.

(source: Taipei Times)








PHILIPPINES:

Congress has authority to re-impose death penalty: Panelo



Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo on Thursday said Congress had the authority to re-impose the death penalty if there were compelling reasons involving heinous crimes.

Panelo made this comment as the Senate announced its resumption of hearings on the revival of the death penalty within this month.

He said that while Section 19 of Article III of the 1987 Constitution prohibited the imposition of the death penalty, the same provision authorized the Congress to pass a law which re-imposed death penalty "for compelling reason involving heinous crimes."

"In other words, the Congress has the authority to re-impose the death penalty, provided that, it finds compelling reasons involving heinous crimes therefor," Panelo said in a press statement.

Contrary to critics' claims, Panelo explained that re-imposition of the penalty was not inconsistent with the Philippines' treaty obligations including under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

"The said instrument allows the imposition of the death penalty and only limits its application to the most serious crimes," he said.

He also explained that treaties could not be in conflict with the country's Constitution which "has higher authority over any legal instrument whether it be passed or ratified by the Congress."

Panelo said while the 2nd optional protocol of the ICCPR mandated the abolition of death penalty, the ICCPR still could not, however, prevail over Congress' authority to re-impose capital punishment.

"Treaties ratified and incorporated and made part of the law of the land are only given equal standing with, and are not superior to our laws," Panelo said.

"Hence, like any other law, a treaty may be repealed by a later act of Congress if it deems that such is warranted under the present circumstances or is violative of our Constitution," he added.

(source: Philippine News Agency)

******************************

Filipino senators give death penalty proposal thumbs down----Bill to bring back executions will likely be killed and not even pass committee stage, they say



A proposal to restore capital punishment in the Philippines is as good as dead, according to legislators in the country's Senate.

The majority of senators, who are supposed to look at a bill to reinstate the death penalty, have expressed doubt over whether the bill would pass.

"Based on our informal consultations, we don't have the required numbers to pass the death penalty bill in the Senate," admitted Senator Panfilo Lacson, one of the authors of the proposed law.

The legislator said it would be a waste of time to tackle a bill that will only be defeated when the time to vote comes.

He advised Senator Manny Pacquiao, chairman of a Senate subcommittee tasked with scrutinize the measure, not to rush a vote on the death penalty, saying the proposal will likely be defeated.

Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon said the proposed law is not even on the legislative agenda of the administration party.

The Senate body under Pacquiao is set to discuss the issue this month, but Drilon expressed doubt whether the bill could go to a vote even at the committee level.

The re-imposition of capital punishment was a campaign promise of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, who vowed to fight the proliferation of illegal drugs and heinous crimes.

In March last year, the House of Representatives passed a measure allowing capital punishment for drug-related offenses.

Allies of Duterte in the Lower Chamber of Congress railroaded the passage of the proposal amid a howl of protests from opposition congressmen, nuns, and activists.

Under the Philippine system, a proposed bill has to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate before it can be signed into law by the president.

The proposed law passed by the House lists 7 drug-related crimes as punishable by death, excluding possession for personal use.

Rape and murder are not included among capital crimes.

Catholic Church leaders have been vocal in their opposition to the proposed measure, saying that capital punishment is "an additional burdensome law" that will not deter crime.

In an interview on Jan. 12, Rodolfo Diamante, executive secretary of the Episcopal Commission on Prison Pastoral Care, said church leaders "will not give up in engaging our lawmakers in working for justice that heals and respect the dignity of the human person."

"We hope and pray that the members of the Senate will vote in accordance with their conscience," he said.

The Philippines abolished capital punishment in 1986. It was restored in 1993 and was suspended again in 2006.

(source: ucanews.com)

***************

Most senators oppose death penalty-Lacson



Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Thursday admitted that holding public hearings on the reimposition of the death penalty would be a "waste of time" since majority of his colleagues are against the revival of capital punishment.

Sen. Emmanuel Pacquiao, who has been assigned to head a panel under the Committee on Justice, will conduct next week a public hearing on 8 pending measures reviving the death penalty since its chairman, Sen. Richard Gordon, is opposed to the reimposition of capital punishment.

"Based on our informal discussion at the session hall and at the lounge, it is really difficult to get the required number to pass the death penalty bill at the Senate," Lacson said in a media forum.

"It will be a waste of time," he added.

Lacson suggested that the Senate should tackle bills that have the chance to be approved instead.

"If I were Sen. Pacquiao, I will first assess how many votes I will get. Do I have 12 votes to pass the Senate's death penalty version?" he said.

Senate President Aquilino Pimentel 3rd instructed Pacquiao to conduct the hearing after Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez criticized the upper house for its failure to approve the death penalty bill which the lower house already passed.

But Lacson said the Senate should instead focus on the passage of the proposed national identification (ID) system and the amendments to the Dangerours Drugs Act.

The 8 pending measures on death penalty revival are Senate Bills 4, 42, 185, 186, 187, 889, 985, and 1294 filed separately by Senators Vicente Sotto 3rd, Joseph Victor Ejercito, Sherwin Gatchalian, Pacquiao, and Lacson.

Legal

Restoring the death penalty law is within the bounds of the Constitution, Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo maintained on Thursday.

Panelo cited Article 3, Section 19, of the Constitution which states that "excessive fines shall not be imposed, nor cruel, degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted" and "neither shall death penalty be imposed, unless, for compelling reasons involving heinous crimes, the Congress hereafter provides for it."

"The Constitution says it can be done. Besides, a treaty can never be superior to the Constitution," Panelo said.

Panelo was referring to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which was signed by the Philippines.

"The same treaty cannot prevail over the authority of Congress under the [Philippine] Constitution to reimpose the death penalty if it determines that there are compelling reasons to penalize or prevent the commission of grievous, odious and hateful offenses that equate to heinous crimes," he said.

Article 6 of the said covenant reads provides: "in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court."

The Philippines abolished capital punishment in 2006.

(source: Manila Times)








SOUTH AFRICA:

Carol Paton: My grandfather saved Nelson Mandela from death penalty



She regards 'Too late the Phalarope' as her grandfather's greatest literary work.

Reacting to Google's decision to dedicate Thursday January 11, 2018 celebrating her grandfather's 115th birthday through a Doodle, financial journalist Carol Paton said the family was extremely honoured by the gesture.

Carol Paton told The Citizen even though the family was not officially informed of the honour by Google, "the family though is deeply appreciative of the gesture and very proud that Alan Paton's contribution to literature and to South Africa has been recognised in this way".

"There isn't a better way in which so many people all around the world could be made aware of or reminded of the legacy of Alan Paton and the role he played in bringing to light the inhumanity of apartheid.

"It is gratifying that today the users of Google have been reminded of the values and ideas that Alan stood for an championed, particularly that we all share a common humanity," she said.

She regards "Too late the Phalarope", which she described as "a wonderful, probing of the relationship between a father and son in an age where men were not expected to show their emotions", as her grandfather's greatest work.

Besides writing, his granddaughter is proud of one other act of humanity, rarely talked about, that she regards as a turning point in this country's history.

"But apart from literature, among Alan's most notable achievements was the evidence in mitigation that he gave at the treason trial of Nelson Mandela, which George Bizos says he believed, resulted in Mandela being spared the death sentence," she explained.

(source: The Citizen)








IRAN----executions

Prisoner Executed In Public



A prisoner who was charged with murdering 7 members of his wife's family was hanged in public in front of a crowd in Salmas.

According to a report by ISNA, on the morning of Thursday January 11, a prisoners was executed in public in Salmas. The prisoner was sentenced to public execution 5 times, 148 lashes, and 14 years in prison on the charge of murdering 7 members of his wife's family on May17, 2017.

"The prisoner was called Hossein Eskandarzadeh and he had been suffering from mental illness for years," Told a close source to Iran Human Rights (IHR). This is the 1st public execution in 2018.

***************************

Execution in Central Iran



A prisoner was hanged at Qazvin Central Prison on murder charges yesterday.

According to a report by Rokna, on Wednesday, January 10, a prisoner was executed at Qazvin Central Prison. The prisoner, identified as Sae'ed, was sentenced to death on the charge of murdering a man in Zaqeh Village in Abyek.

"I was in my shop when Ahmad came by. We drove toward a piece of land that I had sold him -but annulled the contract later. He was mad at me for selling the lot to someone else for a higher price. So we got into a fight in the car, and he tried to hit me with something he took out of the dashboard. I took it from him and hit him twice in the neck, but then I realised that he was bleeding and I got scared and escaped," said the defendant in his defence.

According to Iran Human Rights annual report on the death penalty, 142 of the 530 execution sentences in 2016 were implemented due to murder charges. There is a lack of a classification of murder by degree in Iran which results in issuing a death sentence for any degree of murder regardless of intensity and intent.

(source for both: Iran Human Rights)

******************

Iranian cleric leaves Germany under threat of prosecution over death sentences



A senior Iranian cleric under investigation in Germany for alleged crimes against humanity left the country on a homeward-bound flight on Thursday, cutting short his stay at a Hanover clinic, a German official said.

Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, a former chief justice, was in Germany for treatment at the clinic of Iranian-German neurosurgeon Majid Samii when activists referred him to prosecutors, citing what they called his record of passing death sentences.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), an exiled opposition group, said his issuing of "thousands' of death sentences amounted to a crime against humanity and urged German prosecutors to investigate.

Prosecutors said they were investigating the referrals, including one from senior Green politician Volker Beck. Later, the NCRI reported that Iran had reserved tickets for Shahroudi and his entourage to leave the country.

A German government official told Reuters on Thursday afternoon that Shahroudi was aboard an Iran-bound plane.

While Germany, like all European Union countries, opposes the death penalty, German prosecutors do not automatically act on cases referred to them involving executions in foreign countries.

For the issuing of death sentences to amount to a crime against humanity, they would have to be part of a systematic attack on a civilian population.

An NCRI activist condemned Shahroudi's departure. "He should have been prosecuted for thousands of executions in Iran," said Shahin Gobadi, a member of the NCRI's foreign affairs committee.

NCRI spokesman Javad Dabiran said the group had seen Shahroudi leave the Hanover hospital in a convoy before departing from Hamburg airport on an Iran Air flight at 1325 local time (1225 GMT).

It said it had filed a formal complaint with prosecutors, accusing Shahroudi of committing crimes against humanity and urging Berlin to prevent the cleric from leaving Germany.

An arrest warrant would have to be issued by Germany's constitutional court.

Shahroudi was head of Iran's judiciary for a decade and is currently the head of the Expediency Council, a body intended to resolve disputes between parliament and a hard-line watchdog body, the Guardian Council.

Reuters could not immediately reach Shahroudi for comment.

Shahroudi's visit to a hospital in Germany prompted anger among some Iranians who believe officials in the Islamic Republic should use the same health system as ordinary Iranians.

Parviz Davoudi, an official in his office, said on Monday that "Shahroudi was against traveling to Germany, and only did so after doctors insisted there is a medical emergency."

(source: Arab News)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to