Feb. 6



SOMALIA:

Somali Military Court Sentences Al-Shabab Members for Role in Deadly Blast



A military court in Mogadishu on Tuesday sentenced Al-Shabab member to a death penalty for Mogadishu truck bomb, the court chairman Hassan Nuur Shuute announced.

The court also sentenced 2 men to prison, 1 life imprisonment, while w others were released due to lack of evidence.

More than 500 people were killed in truck bomb blast in Mogadishu on October 14, 2017, which was the deadliest blast in Somalia.

(source: allafrica.com)








MALAYSIA:

Gopi Kumar is 6th victim of minister's delay in bringing into force amended law



Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet) notes that despite the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 receiving royal assent on 27 December 2017, which effectively abolishes the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking, the failure of the minister to what is necessary to bring the law into force has resulted in Malaysian judges still having no choice but to sentence convicted drug traffickers to death.

"Since there is only one sentence provided for under Section 39B of the Act, the court hereby sentences all the accused to death," he [Judge Datuk Ghazali Cha] said. (theSun, 22 January 2018).

Until the new Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 comes into force, judges continues to have no discretion but to sentence those convicted to death.

The most recent victim was Malaysian lorry driver S Gopi Kumar, 33, who was sentenced to death (theSun, 24 January 2018).

Earlier, on 17 January 2018, it was reported that five others, Malaysian A Sargunan, 42, and four Indian nationals (Sumesh Sudhakaran, Alex Aby Jacob Alexander, Renjith Raveendran and Sajith Sadanandan ) were convicted and sentenced to death by the Shah Alam High Court that day for drug trafficking under Section 39B (1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (The Star, 17 January 2018).

As not all cases get reported by the media, there may be many others who have been sentenced to death, who otherwise might not have been if not for this ministerial delay.

A perusal of the Malaysian official e-Federal Gazette website on 25 January 2018 shows that the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017, which received royal assent on 27 December 2017, has still not come into force.

In comparison, other laws that received royal assent on the same day like the Income Tax (Amendment) Act 2017 came into force on 30 December 2017. Even some laws that received royal assent later on 29 December 2018, like the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (Amendment) Act 2018, have already come into force since 11 January 2018.

When the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 comes into force, it will finally abolish the mandatory death penalty for drug trafficking, which has existed since 1983. Judges, will then have the discretion to impose a sentence for drug trafficking other than the death penalty, ie imprisonment with whipping of not less than 15 strokes, for the offence of drug trafficking.

Section 3(2) of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 states:

(2) Any proceedings against any person who has been charged, whether or not trial has commenced or has been completed, and has not been convicted under section 39b of the principal Act by a competent Court before the appointed date, shall on the appointed date be dealt with by the competent Court and be continued under the provisions of the principal Act as amended by this Act.

This means that any person even already on trial for drug trafficking (section 39B), so long as they have not yet been convicted, can still enjoy the benefits of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017.

But until the minister does what is necessary to ensure this law comes into force, judges will continue to have no discretion but to impose the mandatory death penalty on those convicted before the new law applies.

The new law, sadly, does not provide any remedy to those already convicted or for the 800 or more currently on death row after having been convicted for drug trafficking.

Hence, as of today, Gopi Kumar and possibly 5 or more who have already been convicted by the High Court before the new law comes into force are victims of a great injustice and may be hanged to death.

As it stands now, under even the new law, after conviction and being sentenced to death by the High Court, the Appellate Courts also will not have the capacity to change the death sentence to imprisonment, unless they choose to acquit them of drug trafficking or possibly elect to convict them for for a lower offence that does not carry the mandatory death penalty.

In light of the inadequacies of the new upcoming drug law, Malaysia must table another new law that will result in the commuting of the sentence of all those currently on death row after having been convicted of drug trafficking - and even other offences that carry the mandatory death penalty. This will be just for the 2 Malaysians and 4 foreigners sentenced in 2018.

This new law could be tabled in the coming parliamentary session this March 2018. This is the most reasonable approach, considering that there are more than 800 on death row, and judicial review of the sentence of so many may be a difficult or near impossible task.

It must also be reminded, that Malaysia was looking at abolishing the death penalty, especially the mandatory death penalty. While the new Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act 2017 will do away with the mandatory death penalty for just 1 offence - drug trafficking - the mandatory death penalty still exists for murder and so many other offences, some of which are offences that do not result in any grievous injury or death to victims.

(source: aliran.com)








PERU:

Death Penalty Talk Revives Criticism of Human Rights Court



The arrest of a man who has confessed to raping and killing an 11-year-old girl, and burning her remains, has revived the call among some members of Congress to reinstate the death penalty.

Under the 1979 Constitution, the death penalty was abolished except for crimes of treason during times of war, and in 1993 Congress added the crime of terrorism. The last death sentence was issued in 1979, against a non-commissioned Air Force officer charged with spying.

The president of the Judiciary, Duberli Rodriguez, said the global trend shows that the death penalty is not the answer to crime, and instead there should be stronger emphasis on the need for prevention and for stiffer sentences. He also noted that reinstating the death penalty would require amendments to the Constitution and to the Criminal Code.

It would also affect the country's standing in the hemisphere's legal institutions.

"We would have to leave the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and I believe that is not legally convenient," Judiciary president Rodriguez said.

That fact is not lost on some of the lawmakers proposing the death penalty.

Daniel Salaverry and Hector Becerril, leading members of Keiko Fujimori's Fuerza Popular party, believe opting out of the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, IACHR, should be part of the death penalty debate.

Salaverry said he hoped "this generalized indignation that we feel" would drive the Congress to seek solutions to "aggressions against children." Admitting this would jeopardize the country's standing with the Inter-American Court, he questioned the value of its work. "What is the point of this institution? Only to liberate terrorists," he said to RPP radio.

Becerril also criticized the Court. "It has only caused economic and moral harm to the country by approving the liberation of terrorists."

The IACHR held a hearing last week to review President Kuczynski's pardon of former President Alberto Fujimori, which is considered unjustified by the United Nations, by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. The review is at the request of the families whose spouses, children or siblings were murdered by the Colina death squad at the teaching university in La Cantuta and in the low-income district of Barrios Altos in 1992. Both assassinations were known and approved by Fujimori.

Meanwhile, and even though reinstating the penalty would not be a speedy process that could be done in the heat of the moment, the enthusiasm for harsh treatment has led several news sources to bring up the once-famous case of a death sentence gone wrong.

In 1954, a black pickpocket was charged and convicted of the murder of a 3-year-old boy who had been found in the Armendariz ravine, between Miraflores and Barranco (now the access road from the expressway to the Costa Verde beaches). Jorge Villanueva was dubbed by the press as the Monster of Armendariz, which became a household name. He had only been known as a petty thief but 1 witness, an ice cream vendor, had seen him near the ravine. He claimed he was innocent even when he stood to face his firing squad. Years later, he was proved innocent when forensics found that the child's fatal injuries were consistent with being run over by a vehicle and not from violence caused by another human.

(source: Peruvian Times)








IRAQ:

In Iraq, death-row jihadists 'confess' on prime-time TV



Every Friday in Iraq, a gripping show on state television beams the alleged confessions of death-row jihadists into homes around the country.

At peak viewing time, it broadcasts gruesome images of their purported crimes before interviewing the convicts, who appear clad in orange or yellow jumpsuits.

Baghdad declared victory against the Islamic State group in December, after years of fighting to regain vast stretches of territory the jihadists seized in 2014.

Iraq has detained thousands of suspected members of IS, a group infamous for deadly attacks, mass killings and the execution of detainees in orange jumpsuits.

Once a week, a show titled "In the grip of the law" escorts convicted jihadists back to the scene of their crime under heavy security.

By spotlighting IS atrocities, the show aims to stamp out any remaining support for the jihadist group's ideology, its presenter says.

"I get tipped off by the interior ministry, the defence ministry or national security, who captured them," Ahmad Hassan, 36, says.

"They choose the case to highlight and I ask the justice ministry for permission to interview the convict," says Hassan, whose show is aired by state channel Al-Iraqiya.

The programme is up to its 150th episode, he says, and not about to end any time soon.

"Even if IS has lost militarily, its ideology still exists," he says.

"Its supporters view others as non-believers and will continue to murder as long as its ideology lives on."

'Detective agency'

Dressed in a beige suit and brown tie, on a set meant to evoke a detective agency, Hassan starts his show each week with shocking images.

1 episode opens with a photo of dozens of Sunni tribesmen lying in a pool of their own blood, after their 2014 execution by IS in the town of Heet, northwest of Baghdad.

It then introduces Mithaq Hamid Hekmet, 41, one of those condemned over the massacre, who recounts the killings in chilling detail -- even citing the names of others who took part.

On the show's set, a mahogony desk, stacks of papers, maps of Baghdad and mugshots of the day's convict seek to create an intriguing atmosphere to draw in viewers.

In another episode, former IS finance official Mohammad Hamid Omar, nom de guerre Abu Hajjaj, describes his speciality: extorting funds from pharmacies, schools, real estate agencies, petrol stations and doctors.

(source: Agence France-Presse)








IRAN:



Urgent Action

KURDISH MAN SENTENCED TO DEATH AFTER UNFAIR TRIAL

Iranian Kurdish prisoner Ramin Hossein Panahi has been on hunger strike since 27 January in protest of being sentenced to death after a grossly unfair trial that followed four months of enforced disappearance. He has been transferred to solitary confinement in reprisal. His conviction and sentence violate international law and must be quashed.

Write a letter, send an email, call, fax or tweet:

* Ensure that Ramin Hossein Panahi's death sentence and conviction are quashed and release him unless there is sufficient evidence not obtained through torture or other ill-treatment to charge him with a recognizable criminal offence and grant him a fair trial, without recourse to the death penalty;

* Stop using the denial of medical care as a form of punishment and ensure that he is immediately granted access to adequate medical care outside prison;

* Order a prompt, independent and impartial investigation into his prolonged solitary confinement and allegations of torture and other ill-treatment, bringing to justice anyone found responsible, including those with superior responsibility, in fair trials and without recourse to the death penalty.

Friendly reminder: If you send an email, please create your own instead of forwarding this one!

Contact these 2 officials by 19 March, 2018:

High Council for Human Rights

Mohammad Javad Larijani

Esfaniar Boulevard, Niayesh Intersection

Vali Asr Avenue, Tehran, Iran

H.E. Gholamali Khoshroo

Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations

622 Third Avenue, 34th Floor

New York, NY 10017

Phone: (212) 687-2020 -- Fax: (212) 867-7086

Email: i...@un.int

Salutation: Dear Excellency

*******************

At Least 10 Prisoners Scheduled to Be Executed



At least 10 prisoners, most of whom charged with murder, were transferred to solitary confinement at Rajai Shahr Prison.

According to a close source, on the morning of Sunday, February 4, at least 10 prisoners were transferred to Rajai Shahr Prison. The prisoners, most of whom are sentenced to death on murder charges, will be executed if they fail to win the consent of the plaintiffs.

It should be noted that executions at Rajai Shahr are usually carried out on Wednesdays.

According to Iran Human Rights (IHR) annual report on the death penalty, 142 of the 530 execution sentences in 2016 were carried out for murder charges. There is a lack of any classification of murder by degree in Iran which results in issuing a death sentence for all types of the murder, regardless of intensity and intent.

***********************

Iranian Hardline Cleric Says Protesters Should be Sentenced to Death



A Friday prayer leader in Tehran has called for the death penalty to be issued to citizens who participated in the weeklong protests that erupted across Iran in December 2017.

"In our theology, the ruling against those who pour into the streets in opposition to a just Islamic ruler, cause fires or kill people ... is death," said Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami during a sermon on February 2, 2018.

Khatami is a member of the chairing committee of the Assembly of Experts, the constitutional body that select's the country's ruler.

He continued: "If you want to show mercy, that's fine. But don't give us the impression that you just want rioters to go free. There???s a time for mercy and there's a time for rage. You have to be firm against the leaders of the riots, like Imam Ali."

Shia Muslims regard Ali (601-661 AD) as the successor to the Prophet Muhammad.

"Those who were played and fooled should be chastised and woken up and should pledge not to commit mischief again by acting as mercenaries for agitators," added Khatami.

At least 25 people were killed and thousands arrested in Iran's December 2017 protests.

According to information obtained by the Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI), some protesters arrested in Hamadan and Khuzestan provinces were already facing charges that are punishable by death before Khatami's fiery sermon.

"Some of them have been investigated, interrogated and charged with 'rebellion,'" said a legal source in the city of Izeh, Khuzestan Province, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for security reasons.

"The families of the freed detainees have been threatened a lot and are too afraid to talk," added the source. "Most of them say that they are being slapped with serious charges and if they do anything wrong, they could be given heavy sentences."

According to Article 279 of Iran's Constitution: "Moharebeh (rebellion) is defined as drawing a weapon against the life, property or chastity of people or to cause terror as it creates the atmosphere of insecurity."

According to Article 286: "Any person, who extensively commits felony against the bodily entity of people, offenses against the internal or international security of the state, spreading lies, disruption of the economic system of the state, arson and destruction of properties, distribution of poisonous and bacterial and dangerous materials, and establishment of, or aiding and abetting in, places of corruption and prostitution [on a scale] that causes severe disruption in the public order of the state and insecurity, or causes harsh damage to the bodily entity of people or public or private properties, or causes distribution of corruption and prostitution on a large scale, shall be considered as mofsed-e-fel-arz [corrupt on earth] and shall be sentenced to death."

(source for both: Iran Human Rights)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to