March 16



BELARUS:

Belarus Orders Expulsion Of Christian Convert Facing Death Penalty In Iran



Belarusian authorities have ordered the expulsion of an Iranian man who has converted to Christianity and is wanted by Tehran for apostasy and alleged murder, despite warnings by international human rights organizations that he would be at risk of torture and the death penalty if sent back.

Mehrdad Jamshidian's health is deteriorating after he suffered a heart attack in July and was returned to a detention center after only 3 days in a Belarusian hospital.

Jamshidian emigrated to Belarus in 1993 and is married to a Belarusian woman with whom he has 3 children.

Jamshidian has been without legal status since his Iranian passport expired in 2016, and he did not apply for a new one because of "well-founded fears of persecution in Iran," according to Amnesty International.

His multiple requests for asylum and protection have been all rejected by the Belarusian authorities since 2013, and without a new passport he could not apply for residence in the country.

The Belarusian Department of Citizenship and Migration on March 15 issued an order to deport Jamshidian, who has been kept in detention for the past nine months, back to Iran.

Diana, one of Jamshidian’s daughters, told RFE/RL that her father has 5 days to appeal the verdict.

Jamshidian converted to Christianity in 2002 while living in Belarus, a fact that apparently only became known later to the Iranian authorities. Apostasy, the renunciation of Islam, is a crime punishable by death in Iran.

Jamshidian was placed on Interpol's wanted list in 2012 at Tehran's request for allegedly murdering his mother and brother during a visit to Iran, although Amnesty International says he was in Belarus at the time of the murders, and despite his relatives declaring officially that he was not a suspect.

Belarusian authorities, based on the Interpol warrant, arrested him twice, in 2012 and 2013, but did not extradite him eventually because of what they said was insufficient proof from Iran for his expulsion.

However, Belarusian authorities in late 2013 ordered his deportation, resulting in his being detained twice for long periods of time between 2013-2016 before being eventually released due to extenuating circumstances.

'Binding International Principle'

Human rights organizations have been coming to Jamshidian's defense. The UN Committee on Human Rights said in 2017 that, if Jamshidian was extradited to Iran he would be at risk of torture and the death penalty, with no guarantee of a fair trial.

Amnesty International said in July that under "the binding international legal principle of non-refoulement," states cannot transfer a person to a place where they are at real risk of serious human rights violations or abuses.

"Sending Mehrdad Jamshidian to Iran, where he is at risk of grievous harm and possibly death, would be a violation of international law," Amnesty said at the time.

Jamhsidian's other daughter, Katryn, told RFE/RL that Belarusian authorities had long given the family assurances that he could be sent to a 3rd country.

"But now, they are referring to some documents that came from Iran, and saying that the decision about deportation has been made," Katryn said.

"But where? To Iran, where the death penalty awaits him for what he did not and could not have done?

"Iranian authorities are simply seeking revenge for his conversion from Islam to Orthodox [Christianity]. It is very disappointing for us that our home country, Belarus, has sided with Iran in the question of the fate of [our father] and his family."

(source: Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty)








MALAYSIA:

Harapan rep: What death penalty U-turn? We're sticking by manifesto



A Pakatan Harapan lawmaker has rebutted claims by human rights groups that the government was making a U-turn on the abolition of the death penalty.

DAP's Kepayang assemblyperson Ko Chung Sen (photo above) pointed out that the government's move to only abolish the mandatory death penalty was consistent with Harapan's manifesto.

He noted that Lawyers For Liberty had accused the government of making a U-turn while Malaysians against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet) called for the abolition of the death penalty in full.

"Both the Lawyers for Liberty and Madpet will do well to go back to the Harapan 14th general election manifesto.

"It was clearly stated that in page 61 of the English version, under Promise 27: 'the Harapan government will revoke the following laws: Mandatory death by hanging in all Acts'," he said in a statement today.

Ko said it was "not correct" for the unelected NGOs to demand elected representatives to implement something contrarian to their manifesto and the wishes of the people.

He noted that several online surveys have found strong public support for retaining the death penalty but giving discretion to judges.

Ko also rubbished arguments that the death penalty does not act as a deterrent.

"This is definitely a very biased view to generalise the stupidity of 1,267 death row inmates who thought they could escape justice," he said.

While he acknowledged that mistakes could be made in meting out the death penalty, Ko said there was no evidence that it had happened.

The government had initially planned to abolish the death penalty in full despite its manifesto only mentioning the mandatory death penalty.

"We cannot do it half-heartedly like abolishing the death penalty for one offence and keeping it for another. We want to abolish all death penalties," Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Liew Vui Keong had said.

However, after strong opposition, the government backtracked and announced that it will only abolish the mandatory death penalty.

The abolition of the mandatory death penalty would give discretion to judges to decide whether to mete out such a punishment.

(source: malaysiakini.com)

***************

Disappointed Suhakam pushes for total abolition of death penalty



The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has voiced disappointment over the government's decision to abolish mandatory death penalty instead of the proposed total abolition.

Its chairman Tan Sri Razali Ismail (pic) said the move was a "good first step" but maintained that a discretionary death penalty was still a barrier to upholding human dignity and the right to life.

He urged the government to take concurrent steps towards total abolition of the death penalty and move towards ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT).

"Suhakam is of the view that the death penalty is not an effective, nor even the best, crime prevention mechanism within the system of justice," he said.

"There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term," he added.

Razali said there was also always the possibility that an innocent person could end up on death row due to reasons ranging from inadequate defence to a misapplication of forensic science.

Quoting statistics from the Innocence Project, he said the United States has exonerated 364 death row inmates alone through DNA evidence over 25 years.

"How many people in Malaysia would be freed from death row if something similar were applied here?" he asked.

According to Razali, as of October 2018, 1,279 people were on death row in Malaysia and 35 executions took place from 2007 to 2017.

The majority of death row inmates are incarcerated on drugs offences.

He said advocacy group Harm Reduction International lists Malaysia as among the 6 countries with a "high" rate of applying the death penalty in drugs cases" but a United Nations resolution of the Economic and Security Council in 1984 stated that capital punishment could be imposed on only the most serious crimes, which excluded drugs offences.

"Today, 106 countries have abolished the death penalty in recognition that it is cruel and inhumane, and that it does not rehabilitate criminals or address root causes within society which may lead to the enactment of serious crimes."

"Suhakam would like to reiterate its position that the death penalty has no place in a modern legal system as it violates the right to life which happens to be the most basic of all human rights," he said.

He also called for more dialogue between the government and stakeholders to address opposition to the abolishment of the death penalty and other punishments deemed cruel.

(source: thestar.com.my)








ETHIOPIA:

Ethiopian women awaits capital punishment, draws international attention



Nazrawit Abera, the 27 year old Ethiopian citizen imprisoned in China and facing a possible death sentence over a drug offense is gaining the attention of leading and influential players within the Government of Ethiopia, as well as the international media.

Since her story appeared on The Reporter, her issue has been covered by BBC Africa, the Voice of America, the Daily Mail newspaper in the United Kingdom; and officials within the Government of Ethiopia have promised to advocate for her case and see her released. Diaspora activists have also started a petition to help save the life of the Civil Engineer.

Her family members contend that she became an accomplice to a crime by a childhood friend who had asked her to accompany her on a trip to China. The friend eventually was said to have canceled at the last minute and pressured her to go ahead without her. She was said to transport a made-in-Brazil shampoo bottles for her and which would later be discovered containing drugs.

Within days of starting a petition by a childhood friend, EromWalelgn, calling for her release, has gained the attention of more than 10,000 signatories and the attention of Abebe Abebayehu, head of the Ethiopian Investment Commission (EIC).

Abebe confirmed to The Reporter that he had flagged her case to the Ethiopian Ambassador to China for his immediate attention and advocacy during his recent business trip to the country.

(source: thereporterethiopa.com)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to