April 14



TEXAS:

Department of Criminal Justice should permit clergy in execution chamber



Whatever Texans think of the death penalty – and most vigorously support it – we've never questioned the right of condemned prisoners to have a clergy member in the execution chamber.

Never, until last week, when the Texas Department of Criminal Justice started an unnecessary, constitutionally shaky, and mean-spirited policy that bans all clergy from the chamber.

The change in execution policies followed a 7-2 vote by the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the execution of Texas Death Row prisoner Patrick Murphy, 57. Murphy, who became a Buddhist almost a decade ago on Death Row, was scheduled to die by lethal injection at the state penitentiary in Huntsville.

Texas had denied Murphy's request to have a Buddhist clergy member next to him at the moment of execution. Before, TDCJ allowed its own chaplains in the execution chamber. The department, however, employs only Christian and Muslim clergy, raising the constitutional issue of religious discrimination.

Now, to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling, the department won't allow clergy of any faith in the execution chamber. The new policy will affect mostly Christians, who make up the vast majority of Texas' nearly 150,000 prisoners.

Courts will determine whether the department's new policy conforms to the constitution, or unlawfully restricts religious freedom. Either way, Texas made a short-sighted decision. It could have easily resolved this case by hiring a Buddhist chaplain, or spiritual advisor, to perform last rites at Murphy's execution.

Doing so would have enabled the state to move forward, without delay, with Murphy's execution. Now, the state will have to wait until the appellate courts hear Murphy's appeal.

A one-time contract with a Buddhist chaplain probably would cost the state nothing. Ken Goldberg, chaplain of the Buddhist Center of Dallas, told the Herald-Press editorial page he would perform the service without charge. He already attends to dying hospital patients.

TDCJ could apply the same rigorous accreditation standards and background checks to a contract with Goldberg, or another Buddhist chaplain, that it does for its own clergy.

Instead of resolving the problem in a simple and humane way, the state decided to, in effect, stand the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment on its head.

Murphy will elicit little public sympathy. After breaking out of a maximum-security prison in 2000, he and six other escapees, known as the “Texas 7,” robbed a sporting goods store. During the robbery, a police officer was shot and killed. Murphy, who acted as a lookout in the getaway vehicle, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death.

But this isn't about Murphy. It's about the constitutional protection of religious freedom and rights for everyone, even condemned prisoners.

For Christian inmates, the presence of a clergy in their final moment recognizes the state of Texas has rendered its judgment — now, another judgment awaits them. That's a moment the state should relinquish to a higher power, and the U.S. constitution.

(source: Editorial; Palestine Herald-Press)








NORTH CAROLINA:

David Godwin guilty of 1st degree murder in death of Morehead City woman----Both sides rest case in Godwin murder trial



A Carteret County jury has found David Godwin guilty of 1st degree murder in the gruesome death of a Morehead City woman.

Jurors deliberated about 90 minutes Saturday afternoon.

Godwin has been standing trial for the July 4, 2016 killing of 37-year-old Wendy Tamagne.

The woman's body was found in trash bags inside her Morehead City apartment.

The Newport man was found guilty on all counts. Those included 1st degree murder with malice, premeditation, and deliberation; 1st degree felony murder by means of robbery with a dangerous weapon; 1st degree felony murder by means of common law robbery; 1st degree felony murder by means of felonious dismemberment or destroying of human remains; and 1st degree murder by lying in wait.

Prosecutors will now ask the same jury to give Godwin the death penalty.

The man's lawyers said the case was not about who killed the woman, but why. Several of their witnesses testified that Godwin suffered from mental health issues.

(source: WITN news)








TENNESSEE:

My stepfather killed my mother, but he shouldn't die for it ----Don Johnson has become one of my last connections to my mother, and his execution, scheduled for May 16, will not feel like justice to me.



When I was 7 years old, my mother was murdered in Memphis, and my life changed forever. My brother and I moved in with my aunt while my stepfather was convicted of my mother’s murder and sentenced to death.

From that point forward, my closest companion has been my anger toward my stepfather. Every milestone of mine that my mother missed—my 1st date, my prom night, my wedding day, the births of my children—only made me hate my stepfather more. I strongly supported the death penalty because I believed he deserved it.

Since the 1984 murder, time and time again, execution dates were scheduled and then stayed, each time feeling like a slap in the face and upending any progress I had made.

How I learned to connect with death row inmate Don Johnson

A few years ago, I had the opportunity to visit my stepfather for the 1st time on death row. After almost 30 years of being trapped in my own hell that he had caused, I was prepared to let him have it – and I did. I sat down in front of him, shaking with anger and fear, and words flowed out of me that I thought I’d never say.

Tears I forgot were inside me poured out as I threw every trouble and pain I’d experienced for 3 decades on him.

That day, after the end of my tirade, I realized something I had never considered before: all the hate that I had been carrying was only destroying me. What I really needed to heal was to let all that anger go.

And maybe I did, or maybe God took it from me. Whatever happened, I don’t carry it anymore. I’m finally free.

(source: Opinion; Cynthia Vaughn, The Tennessean)








MISSOURI:

Death row inmate deserves no sympathy



It never ceases to amaze us that, quite often, when a death row inmate is about to be executed, he or she argues the method planned to be used to end his or her life amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.

This is obviously a last-ditch effort – after years and years of appeals, often on the taxpayers’ dime – to spare their lives or at least delay execution, but we simply do not buy it.

We often ask ourselves when we hear of these criminals pleading for their lives: What about the cruel and unusual punishment that their victims went through? Didn’t the person they murdered, raped or tortured to death experience cruel and unusual punishment?

Of course they did. It was cruel and unusual punishment committed against them by these criminals. Those also suffering cruel and unusual punishment as a result of these convicted murderers are the victims’ families. Many wait decades for justice for their loved ones who were senselessly taken from them. Some don’t live long enough because the appeals process takes so long.

This is very sad for them, in our opinion. They often can’t receive any closure until they know that the monster who killed their loved one is no longer living.

Consider the case of death row inmate Russell Bucklew in Missouri. He has been on death row since 1996 for the rape and murder of a woman. For 23 years, the family of the victim has waited for justice to be done. Bucklew and his attorneys have tied up his death penalty case all this time, recently taking their argument all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bucklew’s attorneys did not dispute that Bucklew committed the crime; instead, they argued before the high court that he has a rare medical condition called cavernous hemangioma, which causes blood-filled tumors to grow around his head and neck and that using lethal injection would cause Bucklew pain during the execution, thereby resulting in cruel and unusual punishment.

It was clear that this very weak and desperate argument was a last-ditch effort to save this cold-blooded killer’s life.

We didn’t buy it, and thankfully the majority of the high court didn’t buy it. In a 5-4 vote, the majority said the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment does not mean that executions must be painless.

Justice Neil Gorsuch also concluded that under the court’s precedents in two previous cases, Bucklew is required to present an alternative method of execution that is feasible, readily implemented and likely to reduce the chances of extreme pain.

Bucklew, whose lawyers suggested the largely untested method of nitrogen asphyxiation as an alternative to lethal injection, failed to meet those burdens, Gorsuch said. Alabama, Oklahoma and Mississippi have approved the use of nitrogen asphyxiation, but it remains experimental.

In a dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer, joined by his fellow liberals, wrote that the majority’s requirements could permit states to execute those who will endure pain similar to that inflicted by burning at the stake.

To suggest that putting someone to death through the means of lethal injection is comparable to being burned at the stake is a huge stretch, and frankly is a rather ridiculous comment to make.

The majority of the high court got it right in this case.

Bucklew had choices in life, like we all do. In 1996, he made the choice to rape and murder a woman. He showed her no mercy or sympathy on that day, but 23 years later he asks for sympathy.

He doesn’t deserve one ounce of mercy or sympathy. He chose his path in life. He showed his victim very cruel and unusual punishment, and if he receives it he is most certainly deserving of it.

(source: Editorial, Bowling Green (KY) Daily News)








ARIZONA----new death sentence

Jury sentences Missouri man to death for 2 Arizona murders



A Missouri man convicted in the 2012 murders of his sister-in-law and her boyfriend in Arizona has been sentenced to death.

Yavapai County Superior Court officials say a jury reached its verdict Wednesday and lawyers for 35-year-old Kenneth Wayne Thompson have already filed an appeal.

Jurors began deliberating March 30 whether Thompson should get life in prison or the death penalty.

He has been convicted Feb. 20 on 2 counts of 1st-degree murder.

Prosecutors say Thompson used a hatchet and knife to kill Penelope Edwards and Troy Dunn in March 2012 and then poured acid on the bodies and then set his sister-in-law's Prescott Valley home on fire.

Jurors rejected arguments by Thompson's attorneys that his motive for the slayings was rooted in his upbringing as a Scientologist.

(source: Associated Press)








OREGON:

2nd suspect faces murder in 2018 Hermiston slaying



A 2nd Hermiston man is on the hook for the 2018 shooting death of Erik Navarrete.

Vincent Wesley David Shermantine, 29, faced charges Friday afternoon of murder, 1st-degree robbery, felon in possession of a firearm and unlawful use of a weapon. District Attorney Dan Primus said Shermantine’s arraignment was Friday at 1:15 p.m. in Hermiston.

According to the indictment, Shermantine and co-defendant David Edgar Sommerville, 19, also of Hermiston, robbed Navarrete at gunpoint on June 4, 2018, and Sommerville in the course of the crime shot and killed Navarrete.

Hermiston police on Thursday identified Sommerville as a suspect. Shermantine and Sommerville have been in the jail since late March on charges unrelated to the homicide. Hermiston Police Chief Jason Edmiston said investigators identified the pair as suspects before the arrests but had to wait for the analysis of some evidence. He also said “there is a family relation” between Shermantine and Navarrete.

Sommerville faces charges of 1st-degree robbery, unlawful use of a weapon, murder and aggravated murder in Navarrete’s death. Aggravated murder is the only crime in Oregon that carries the threat of the death penalty.

The governor’s office in 2011 placed a moratorium on executions, but district attorneys sill have to consider capital punishment. Umatilla County has not had an aggravated murder case since 2015. The seriousness of the charge requires lawyers with the expertise to handle death penalty cases.

The court appointed two Portland-area lawyers to represent Sommerville: Benjamin Kim and Steve Lindsey. They defended Edwin Lara, 31, who in January 2018 pleaded guilty to aggravated murder for the 2016 killing of 23-year-old Kaylee Sawyer of Bend. Lara is serving a life sentence at Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Pendleton.

Sommerville’s attorneys filed a request for the court to order the district attorney’s office to allow inspections of evidence and provide copies of police reports, recordings, photographs and more. Primus said his office has set a meeting with Kim and Lindsey.

(source: East Oregonian)








WASHINGTON:

Let voters decide fate of death penalty



In reading former Department of Corrections Secretary Eldon Vale’s column in the April 6 U-B, much of his objection to the death penalty was focused on protecting staff who are participants in carrying out these executions.

I had first-hand knowledge as the administrative assistant for the Washington State Penitentiary superintendent for the Westley Alan Dodd execution in 1993. Dodd kidnapped and murdered 3 young boys in 1989. At that time, I as well as other staff, were given the option of participating or bowing out with no objection.

I believe justice is served when people such as Dodd are executed. Were I a parent of one of these 3 young boys who were murdered by Dodd and knew he was continuing to live, I believe I would think every day that he was living while my little boy was dead. If that were so, justice would not have been served.

Executions fit the crime of what convicted killers deserve, but that is my opinion.

I hope the legislators will pass this on to the public to let the voters decided whether or not to retain executions in the state of Washington.

Jerry Davis

Walla Walla

(source: Letter to the Editor, Union-Bulletin)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to