i don't need any of the 2.6.23 functionality - I was just really trying the 2.6.23 kernel to make sure nothing major was broken with it.
I *could* use bootp I suppose, but that would require a tftp service someplace - suppose that's not so hard. I will probably just wait for an update, or find the newer aboot sources, or figure our how to remove the offending PT_NOTE entries if necessary. I already boot without using an initrd image, so that's all kinda taken care of already I guess :). ...tom On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:41:54 -0400, Jay Estabrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Evans wrote: >> I was trying to boot 2.6.23-rc1 a few weeks ago. Asked about the newer >> binutils - thought that may have been the reason it failing. >> >> Glad you hit the kml instead and found an answer (and glad I wasn't the >> only person seeing a problem with the 2.6.23-rcX series). >> It wasn't a binutils issue, but that the stock aboot is misguided. >> >> I'd also be willing to test a patched aboot. > > If you can't wait for that, you can always use BOOTP, which bypasses > aboot entirely... :-) > > Just: > > make boot > make bootpzfile > scp arch/alpha/boot/bootpzfile someplace:/tftpboot > > However, your config prolly would need to change, to build in most > of the stuff that's now loaded from INITRD, although that can be > accomplished as well via some trickery... ;-} > > Good luck. > > --Jay++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]