Petr Salinger a écrit :
Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
with attached patch for kernel and clone.c it should be possible leave
SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 free for user code.
Current libc will work with current and new kernel,
new libc will require new kernel.
Thanks for the patch, a new kernel has just been uploaded. A new glibc
will follow soon, probably tomorrow. I have already a working one on my
disk, but I need to make a clean patch first.
--- clone.c.OLD 2005-11-08 17:25:02.000000000 +0100
+++ clone.c 2005-11-08 17:32:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@
if ((flags & CSIGNAL) != 0 && (flags & CSIGNAL) != SIGCHLD)
{
- /* This implementation of clone() supports only the SIGUSR1 signal. */
- if ((flags & CSIGNAL) != SIGUSR1)
+ /* This implementation of clone() supports only the 128 signals. */
+ if ((flags & CSIGNAL) & RFTHPNMASK)
This line has to be
+ if ((flags & CSIGNAL) & ~RFTHPNMASK)
{
__set_errno (EINVAL);
return -1;
}
- rfork_flags |= RFLINUXTHPN;
+ rfork_flags |= (RFLINUXTHPN | ((flags & CSIGNAL) << RFTHPNSHIFT));
}
if (flags & CLONE_VM)
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
