Petr Salinger a écrit :
Now, when logs from SVN are elsewhere,
I second Aurelien's "switch everything to debian-bsd"
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2006/02/msg00114.html).
Then we supress glibc-bsd-devel ?
Yes, hibernate glibc-bsd-devel.
Or maybe we want to keep it for development issues?
(and let debian-bsd be for user questions and general stuff)
For now discuss on debian-bsd both user and development issues.
I guess it will not bother users to know what's going on with their port.
Agreed. This is already true for other ports, maybe not for amd64, but
for other lists I am subscribed like -sparc, -mips or -hppa where there
is as much development questions as users questions.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
