Hi, On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 10:38:17PM +0100, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > Some reminders of things specific to the 1.9.2 release that might affect > debian > packaging: > > Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.2 depends on foolscap 0.6.3, which is a change from Tahoe-LAFS > 1.9.1. > > (It looks like squeeze only had foolscap 0.5.0, but wheezy and sid have > 0.6.4.) > > The other dependency that needs checking is pycryptopp >= 0.5.20 (again, the > version in wheezy and sid is fine).
Thanks, I had reviewed that kind of details already, and planned to update the package accordingly, but it's always usefull to have a sump up. > Also bear in mind that the non-SUMO tarballs for 1.9.2 included some generated > files that shouldn't be there (which might cause a problem similar to Debian > bug 653312). If you get the SUMO tarball > (https://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/releases/allmydata-tahoe-1.9.2-SUMO.tar.gz) > and delete the tahoe-deps directory, that should be clean of generated files, > but > please check to make sure. Yeah, I'm not using the SUMO versions of your tarballs, precisely for this reason. Debian packaging can't diverge too much with the original upstream tarballs. I'm currently done polishing the last details of the packaging and giving it a few installation/usage tests before releasing it. Upload should come soon. Thanks for your help bert. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
