> > > OK, I'll update the package, but maybe we should wait till the end of > the week > > and ask for a new release of smbldap-tools, as the one in Debian is > already > > outdated. >
I think if we can test the package with an empty installation can bring us a faster new smbldap-tools release. We should test if with an empty installation we have some other bugs derived from "use strict" at perl. After some tests, I think we can ask smbldap-tools developer's team to a new release. > > And, anyway, I'm not using smbldap-tools anymore, if anyone on the Cc: > list > > wants to take over mainteinance, be my guest, please. > > I'm sorry I'm not using smbldap-tools too, tt only appeared on my > 'radar' some time ago to remove the Digest::SHA1 dependency which was > one goal of the Debian Perl Group, and now due to the bugreport from > Saulo on libconvert-asn1-perl. > I'd like to help here, but I'm an occasional user of the package, and my servers are always to small networks, I'm not the right mantainer to this package... > > BTW, I've already have the latest upstream version packaged, but I didn't > > uploaded it because I wanted to see how many debian bugs were closed by > it and > > didn't had the time to look into it and test (I planned to use a LXC > container > > with a clean installation of a system with OpenLDAP and SAMBA, but I > haven't > > been able to work on it in the last weeks). > > This is great, as more (important) bugs fixed with a new release the > better. Again, sorry cannot help here good, but maybe Saulo can > provide some feedback? > Really sorry, I would like to help here, but I can't do it this days. Anyway, if I get some news with this question, I will update this report. I think we should wait some more days. We need make sure we have no another critical bug. smbldap-tools team updated only 2 of the scripts... Thanks Saulo
