On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Chris Knadle wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:34:28, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Of these 2. would seem to be the best option. > > I agree. >
[...] I believe in order to actually evaluate any of these solutions, someone is going to have to prepare binaries, and do an table showing the tested (not theoretical) compatibility of with multiple different clients (and servers?) to their solution's server and client. I propose that whoever wants to see a particular solution actually sit down and do the work for their particular solution, with sources, binaries, interdiffs, and compatibility table conveniently available in some public location. FWICT, Ron and Thorvald feel that speex will be their favored solution and will have a version of it available no sooner than a week from now, so there's at least a week for other people to do the work. [And if no one wants to do the work for a solution, then there's no point in even considering it.] Feel free to coordinate using this bug or privately, but I don't believe that further theoretical discussions of client/server compatibility are useful. [At least, I'm personally not going to vote to override a maintainer without an actual tested solution that is technically superior, and I suspect that other CTTE members share that opinion.] Don Armstrong -- Frankly, if ignoring inane opinions and noisy people and not flaming them to crisp is bad behavior, I have not yet achieved a state of nirvana. -- Manoj Srivastava in 87n04pzhmh....@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org