On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Michael Tokarev wrote: > For example, such slash appending affected one of my > bugs, 686524, -- after "found 686524 foo" control message > the list of versions this bug if fond it has grow to one > more version, "foo/".
Except that it won't. [You can try it.] foo has to be a valid source version for this to happen. [Basically, because of the bug in dak, foo was reported to the bts as the source name with a version '', so it resolved versions correctly.] > So, it isn't possible to remove such tagging, and more, a valid > command (but maybe with a bogus version number) is int parsed > correctly. The command is parsed correctly; 1.1.2+dfsg-1/ isn't a valid version, so doesn't pass the regex for the command, and is ignored. Don Armstrong -- It has always been Debian's philosophy in the past to stick to what makes sense, regardless of what crack the rest of the universe is smoking. -- Andrew Suffield in 20030403211305.gd29...@doc.ic.ac.uk http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org