On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> For example, such slash appending affected one of my
> bugs, 686524, -- after "found 686524 foo" control message
> the list of versions this bug if fond it has grow to one
> more version, "foo/".

Except that it won't. [You can try it.] foo has to be a valid source
version for this to happen. [Basically, because of the bug in dak, foo
was reported to the bts as the source name with a version '', so it
resolved versions correctly.]
 
> So, it isn't possible to remove such tagging, and more, a valid
> command (but maybe with a bogus version number) is int parsed
> correctly.

The command is parsed correctly; 1.1.2+dfsg-1/ isn't a valid version,
so doesn't pass the regex for the command, and is ignored.


Don Armstrong

-- 
It has always been Debian's philosophy in the past to stick to what
makes sense, regardless of what crack the rest of the universe is
smoking.
 -- Andrew Suffield in 20030403211305.gd29...@doc.ic.ac.uk

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to