Le mercredi 16 janvier 2013 à 22:29 +0700, Ken Heard a écrit : > On 2013-01-16 01:40, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Unless you can reproduce the problem on a pure Squeeze system (I > > personally could not), I will close this bug in a few weeks. > > Are you seriously suggesting that I should remove all packages which are > not sourced from Debian Squeeze stable, if that is what your mean by a > "pure" Squeeze system? If so you are asking me to remove my whole > desktop environment. I am rather suggesting to try on another machine, either another physical machine or otherwise a virtual machine. > What evidence do you have that the problem lies is use of those > packages? For at least three weeks all those what you call non-Debian > packages and Gnucash were all working together until 2013-01-03, the day > when both Gnucash and hardinfo would not load because of a segmentation > error. I could turn your question around: what evidence do you have that the problem comes from Debian, given the large number of non-Debian packages that you have installed, and given the fact that I cannot reproduce your problem? > You indicated that you were able to have Gnucash 2.4.10-2 from > squeeze-backports opening properly. I was not however using that > version when the bug I reported occurred. As I have already stated that > bug occurred when I was still using Gnucash 2.2.9-10 from Squeeze main > and inherited from lenny-backports. > > It was only *after* I discovered the bug with version 2.2.9-10 that I > removed 2.2.9-10 and installed 2.4.10-2. When I tried to open that > version it returned the same segmentation error. > > I had asked you whether you tried to replicate the problem I described > using 2.2.9-10. You did not answer that question. I confirm that on a pure and up-to-date Squeeze system, I can launch GnuCash 2.2.9-10 fine. > I had also mentioned that the version of Iceweasel I had installed, > 17.0, crashed whenever I tried to download a file with it. I cannot > understand why you claim that this version does not exist in Squeeze > when I clearly got it from squeeze-backports. No, it comes from this unofficial repository: http://mozilla.debian.net/ Note that even though this repository is run by a Debian Developer, it is not an official repository of the Debian project, and therefore is unsupported by Debian. As a general rule, anything that is not hosted on debian.org is not part of Debian (in particular, stuff on debian.net is *not* part of Debian). Regards, -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
