On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Beckmann <deb...@abeckmann.de> wrote: ... > > What I'd like to see is (in probable order of implementation) > * piuparts-report "discovering" all existing known problem descriptions > instead of hardcoding them > - need to add ordering information somehow, perhaps by adding a > number prefix: 42_foo_not_found_issue.conf > or by adding a variable with a sort key inside > (there should be a bug or some todo entries about this) > - needs to move title information from piuparts-report to .conf > * piuparts-report generating the known problem reports, allowing access > to packagedb etc. for "better" reports, making .tpl files obsolete > * getting rid of error/issue redundancies > * computing the .kpr with python re instead of grep > * adjusting the .conf and .kpr formats to what is actually needed >
I would prioritize python re. The results could affect the strategy for the rest. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org