On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:37, a...@adam-barratt.org.uk said: > libgcrypt maintainers - any thoughts on this?
Did anything change since my comments from 2010? OpenLDAP needs to get it right and it would even be better if all applications would set up a their policy regarding their demand for private key protection. For instacne by setting up a custom memory handler. My current problem with OpenLDAP is that it can't be used anymore with GnuTLS 3 because the OpenSSL emulation switched to GPLv3+ and thus no software with GPLv2only parts is able to use OpenLDAP. The straightforward solution would be to change OpenLDAP to use the native GNUTLS API and while at it also fix the libgcrypt initialization. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
