* Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> [130519 23:24]: > > Doesn't relatime update atime when it is older than a day? So doesn't > > relatime/strictatime just change from "second of last use before popcon > > run" so "second of first use in a 24 hours window, but still exact to > > a second"? > > Not exactly. It is only updated if it is 24 hour old. > So you get the exact time of an event you cannot qualify. This is the stopped > watch fallacy.
The worst case with strictatime is a program called less than once per day, where popcon sends out total usage information. With relatime exactly the same happens. > > > It is important the vote determination is done in a centralised way. > > > > How does that prevent not sending timestamps? > > If you do not have the timestamps, then you have to rely on the client > computation being correct. So you can trust clients to collect correct timestamps, but not to compare them? I do not understand. Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org