* Henri Salo [Wed Jun 26, 2013 at 10:10:32AM +0300]: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:23PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > we're lagging quite some versions behind with our sleuthkit > > packaging in Debian. I tried to take care of it and just pushed > > upstream and pristine-tar branches for new upstream version 4.1.0 of > > sleuthkit to our git repos (I hope you don't mind, Christophe).
> > I also pushed my changes related to Debian packaging into branch > > mika/4.1.0 (to not mess with main 'debian' branch yet until it's > > known to be fine). > > I'm a bit unsure how to handle the libtsk3 package though. > > Our latest package libtsk3-3 shipped /usr/lib/libtsk3.so.3.4.0 > > but upstream seems to have renamed 'tsk3' to just 'tsk' and I'm not > > sure how to handle the resulting /usr/lib/libtsk.so.10.0.0 package > > wise. > > Julien, you seem to have handled also the symbol files in the past > > and know what you're doing. :) Any chance you could take a look at > > the current situation and help us in getting a new package release > > out? > I can't see sleuthkit 4.1.0 yet in unstable. What is the status with this? I > can > help with some smaller tasks and testing if needed. [...] It's still as stated above. We need a decision how to handle the tsk library. regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature