On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:30:33PM +0000, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: > This issue might be blocking a project to include Tahoe-LAFS as a tool > in the Tails system: > > https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6227 > > It isn't clear to me if this is really a blocker — maybe the Tails > people can use Tahoe-LAFS even without the improved init scripts, or > even without any init scripts at all! But I'm motivated to push this > issue (debian #652003) forward in part because I want to push Tails > #6227 forward.
In my opinion Tahoe-LAFS can be used in Tails without this initscript feature. This one will mostly helps sysadmin willing to run several nodes on their systems. For a desktop user as in Tails' context, being able at least to configure client nodes in the user $HOME and start them by hand is already a good minimal integration. Tails could benefit from this initscript though, to make Tahoe-LAFS nodes configured in the user $HOME to be automatically started, if a Tails user decides so. But I believe this needs more integration work in Tails, and could be a second step. bert. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
