Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Bug#727708: systemd (security) bugs"):
> Another point here is that it's sounding like we'll be using a lot of
> those services regardless, at least on systems that need them, which means
> that their security track record and bug rate is somewhat irrelevant for
> this discussion provided that running systemd doesn't force them to be
> running on systems that don't need them. [...]
I don't think that's entirely true. I think it is fair to look at the
security history of other parts of the same project as indicative
regarding code quality.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
