On 24 January 2014 05:11, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's why I am not sure if it's better to leave this open or close > it. Realistically, I don't think that this is going to be fixed,
Not immediately, but that is no reason to close it off. There is real work that can be done here, especially after work on startup times. > and > in any case not because of the existence of this problem, so leaving > it open will not increase the chances of it being fixed. Leaving the report open does bring it to the attention of people looking to work on real issues. This task is perhaps interesting to someone looking to do non-trivial work. > Also it was > ignored for the best part of 4 years with no "me toos". > "me toos" is not really the character of bugs.d.o. Lack of these does not indicate disinterest. > I only see it useful as a reminder, or to leave hints like what you > gave above. Yes. For these and similar reasons many bugs are left open. Closing the reports does not make the issues go away. Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
