On 6 February 2014 06:37, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > On 2014-02-05 00:56:26 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: >> On 4 February 2014 19:53, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: >> > On 2014-02-04 10:49:53 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: >> >> Again, I am only addressing the proposed patch. There are better >> >> options, such as adjusting the default value of >> >> Aptitude::ProblemResolver::SolutionCost to account for the number of >> >> removals vs installs, or similar, but people should use such settings >> >> and provide feedback on the quality of the solutions and their order. >> > >> > It would be better if aptitude could tell the reasons that led to the >> > proposed solution. >> >> Do you mean: >> >> --\ icedtea6-plugin depends upon openjdk-6-jre (= 6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2) >> -> Remove icedtea6-plugin [6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2 (now, oldstable)] >> --\ openjdk-6-jre depends upon libjpeg8 >> -> Remove openjdk-6-jre [6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2 (now)] >> >> ? > > Something like that. Perhaps that's what the -v --show-why options do. >
Use 'o' when examining a solution in the curses interface. On the command line, set Aptitude::CmdLine::Resolver-Show-Steps=1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
