Hi László, Sorry for the late response.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014, at 02:36 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan > <rkrish...@debian.org> wrote: > > Package: libjs-d3 > > Version: 3.4.6-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > I noticed that the d3.js generated by the Debian package is very > > different from the d3.js shipped with the upstream tarball. I don't > > know at this point, if any functionality is affected. But a simple > > diff a lot of changes. > I've several complex examples locally. Those works normally. > > > One of the reason for this could be that the d3 upstream package > > requires uglify version 2.4.0 where as the d3 debian package is > > using the one shipped with Debian, which is 1.3.4. > Yes, this is the reason. UglifyJS does several alternations, not > affecting the code itself. As such, the UglifyJS build dependency is > not a hard one. I just noticed that Jonas created a package for Uglify2 and uploaded[1] it. > > > I have raised > > a wishlist bug against the node-uglify package (#745687) requesting > > an upgrade of the uglify package. I don't know at this point if > > this will fix the problem. > That would 'fix' it, ie it would look like the same to the one from > upstream. > But please note that UglifyJS 1.x [1] and 2.y [2] are different > projects, developed differently and not an upgrade. > I'd like to see UglifyJS2 2.y packaged as well, but it seems the > JavaScript team is lacking manpower. Thanks. I understand. I hope this upload will help you change the packaging to use the uglify2. I would love to join the debian js team and contribute. I just lack time at this point. But I surely hope to come back and help out. A big thanks for all the work you and other Debian JS hackers are doing to get things going. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745687 -- Ramakrishnan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org