On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 18:13 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > 2014-05-19 22:00 GMT+02:00 Tobias Frost <t...@coldtobi.de>: > > > > I reuploaded the current state to mentors; It should be here: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-it/aspell-it_2.4-20070901-0-2.1.dsc > > (Of course the binary on mentors is currently built against > > dictionaries-common-dev 1.23.2, so it will need a rebuild anyway as soon > > as 1.23.3 is in the archives.) > > Hi, > > Thanks for your work in this reference package. > > Finally had time to look into it. Just a couple of mostly cosmetic > issues, see attached patch. > > -Vcs-git: git://anonscm.debian.org/users/derevko-guest/aspell-it.git > +Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/users/derevko-guest/aspell-it.git > > for the benefit of Emacs colorizer. > > -Depends: aspell (>= 0.60.3-3), ${misc:Depends}, ${aspell:Depends} > +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${aspell:Depends} > > current installdeb-aspell ${aspell:Depends} sets plain "aspell" as > dependency. Since oldstable aspell is 0.60.6-4, plain aspell should be > enough, as Andreas suggested. If for some reason an explicit minimal > aspell version is needed it would indeed need to be added, but I do > not think is the case.
I've just uploaded a new version of the example package to mentors (location's the same). Changes are the suggested ones above: B-D only on unversioned aspell, s/Vcs-git/Vcs-Git, removing aspell dependency in binary package. > By the way, dictionaries-common-dev 1.23.3 is already in the archive. > A new 1.23.4 will be uploaded soon with some changes regarding > emacsen-common dependency, but it will not affect aspell-simple. > Ok. > >> PS: should we request a "transition tracker" at some point? > > I wonder how many plain aspell dicts will benefit of this. Have to > look at this when I have time. > > Regards, > I think I've already collected this information. (However, this might be inaccurate in details as the context was a little different when I assembled this information. The focus was at that time if it has the hashfile symlinked. ) Then likely those packages would benefit from dh_aspell-simple: aspell-br aspell-cs aspell-cy aspell-el aspell-en aspell-fr aspell-ga aspell-gu aspell-hi aspell-hr aspell-hsb aspell-hu aspell-is aspell-it aspell-kk aspell-kn aspell-ml aspell-mr aspell-or aspell-pa aspell-pl aspell-sk aspell-sl aspell-ta aspell-te aspell-uz aspell-ro aspell-sv aspell-tl
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
