On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:06:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > It might be better for such acpi handlers to have a common way of > configuring which one gets to do this. This could be done through the > alternatives system, or through a shared debconf question in the manner > of the desktop managers. The situation here is, after all, very similar: > we have several implementations of things that might want to do the same > thing, where it is at least fairly annoying if multiple of these things > try to do so.
Great idea, but I kind of doubt anyone is going to implement this. The current point of view is that acpi-support is supposed to be the last resort, meaning that it only handles events if nothing else does. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org