On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 10:52 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Robert de Bath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
What do you mean, reinstate? This is the same behaviour you get at
present. Well, here's a new version that might do that.
I was sure ... hmmm, segfault? ... Oh I see.
I'd copied the (static) exe to a wheezy (3.2 kernel) machine; that's
where it gives a 'cannot execute' error. I suppose that means it's an
upstream 'bug'.
Okay, the new patch is good for me. I've again tried it with the flag
both ways. It runs the executables correctly when the flag is set and
gives a reasonably nice (and quite specific) error when it's not. ("Exec
format error")
I also have a i386 userspace running happily.
I'd say it's good to go.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
73.46% of all statistics are made up.
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>)
<http://www.debath.co.uk/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
