Hello, Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series > shipped with the respective release. > Would it be worse to add such an entity?
I'm actually surprised it wasn't there already.: > Is 3.14 kernel for Jessie correct? Recent mails said it'd rather be 3.16 > Index: en/appendix/files.xml > =================================================================== > --- en/appendix/files.xml (Revision 69218) > +++ en/appendix/files.xml (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ > <para> > > A standard installation for the amd64 architecture, including all standard > -packages and using the default 2.6 kernel, takes up &std-system-size;MB of > disk space. > +packages and using the default &linuxkernelseries-ver; kernel, takes up to > +&std-system-size;MB of disk space. > A minimal base installation, without the <quote>Standard system</quote> > task selected, will take &base-system-size;MB. Well, I'm not sure it's actually useful to mention the kernel version at all actually. Mentioning the precise version (3.16) seems really pointless at least. > Index: en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml > =================================================================== > --- en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml (Revision 69218) > +++ en/install-methods/tftp/rarp.xml (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > > </para><para> > > -On a RARP server system using a Linux 2.4 or 2.6 kernel, or Solaris/SunOS, > +On a RARP server system using a Linux 2.4, 2.6 or 3.x kernel, or > Solaris/SunOS, I would rather patch into "Linux 2.4 and further". The functionality is not to go away any time soon, even in a 4.x etc. timeframe. > =================================================================== > --- en/partitioning/tree.xml (Revision 69218) > +++ en/partitioning/tree.xml (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ > <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry> > </row><row> > <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry> > - <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 > kernels)</entry> > + <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4, 2.6 and 3.x > kernels)</entry> I wouldn't even mention the version: I've seen /proc for as long as I can remember. > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ > <entry>Essential system binaries</entry> > </row><row> > <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry> > - <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry> > + <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 and 3.x > kernels)</entry> I'd rather patch into "Linux 2.6 and further", I don't think /sys is to go away. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org