On Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:22:06 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam- barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > > On 2014-09-05 11:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Seems from <https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ghostscript> and > > <https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghostscript> > > that binary package ghostscript-cups needs to explicitly be removed > > from > > testing to allow new release (which has that package dropped) is > > allowed > > to migrate to testing. > > No, it needs to be removed _from unstable_. Binary packages are not > individually removed from testing other than as part of an automatic > migration. (and in any case removal from testing wouldn't help, as the > outdated packages would still be _in unstable_.) > > > ...and reportbug tells me you are the ones to task to about that. > > If your choice of suite were correct, sure. :-) As it's not, it's not. > > I'm re-assigning this to ftp.d.o rather than closing it, but to save > people checking, the reason that the package isn't getting > semi-autoremoved by the FTP team is: > > dak rm -m "[auto-cruft] NBS (no longer built by ghostscript)" -s > unstable -a > amd64,arm64,armel,armhf,hurd-i386,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd- i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,ppc64el,s390x,sparc > -p -R -b ghostscript-cups > - broken Depends: > splix: printer-driver-splix
Once the reverse depend is fixed, please remove the moreinfo tag. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
